Scaling Judicial Cases
A Methodological Note
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3756522 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1961 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Fascículo | 8 |
| Páginas | 31-34 |
| Data de publicação | 1961-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/000276426100400810 |
| OpenAlex | W2428775373 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
Another step forward in the burgeoning legal science of court decisions is represented in this article by Dr. Ulmer of Michigan State University's Department of Political Science. Using coefficients of reproducibility and scalability, he shows how highly consistent is the position of individual Supreme Court justices concerning deprivations of civil liberties. While this note deals specifically with the application of scaling techniques to judicial materials, the methods described may be generalized to other types of political data
Civil liberties · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Position (finance) · Scaling · Sociology · State (computer science) · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Mathematics
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,05 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1962 - 1979 (18) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |