Inoculating an Infodemic
An Ecological Approach to Understanding Engagement With Covid-19 Online Information
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3757441 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Shandell Houlden (0000-0003-1873-6609, Royal Roads University, autor correspondente), Jaigris Hodson (0000-0002-2235-3718, Royal Roads University), George Veletsianos (0000-0002-6579-9576, Royal Roads University), Christiani P Thompson (0000-0002-8845-1273, University of Saskatchewan), Darren Reid (0000-0002-1589-9608, Department of History, University College London, London, UK) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Fascículo | 14 |
| Páginas | 1990-2013 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00027642211050903 |
| OpenAlex | W3205085813 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 50 |
As the global COVID-19 pandemic has been concurrently labelled an "infodemic," researchers have sought to improve how the general public engages with information that is relevant, timely, and accurate. In this study, we provide an overview of the reasons why people engage and disengage with COVID-19 information. We use context-rich semi-structured interviews which invited participants to discuss online COVID-19-related content they encountered. This qualitative approach allows us to uncover subtle but important details of influences that drive online engagement. Participants both engaged and disengaged with content for individual and social reasons, with seven themes emerging connected to their engagement including actions in response to information, reasoning for engagement, content, motivating concerns, frequency of engagement with information, site of exposure, and given reason for not engaging. Many of these themes intersected and informed each other. Our findings suggest that researchers and public health communicators should approach engagement as an ecology of intersecting influences, both human and algorithmic, which change over time. This information could be potentially helpful to public health communicators who are trying to engage the public with the best information to keep them safe during the pandemic
Context (archaeology) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Disease · Geography · Pandemic · Political science · Public engagement · Public health · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Nursing · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics
The Platform Society
Media Technologies
Like, comment, and share on Facebook
Why Students Share Misinformation on Social Media
Acceptance of a Covid-19 vaccine is associated with ability to detect fake news and health literacy
From Editors to Algorithms
Trust and Sources of Health Information
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Science Journalism and Pandemic Uncertainty
Partisan Selective Sharing
Effects of misinformation on Covid-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation
Fighting Covid-19 Misinformation on Social Media
Unwillingness to engage in behaviors that protect against Covid-19
I get by with a little help from my friends
Facebook Users' Motivation for Clicking the “Like” Button
Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
Toward a cumulative ecological risk model for the etiology of child maltreatment
A cultural task analysis of implicit independence
Social Context and Information Seeking
The Duality of Media
Connecting With Hyperlocal News Website
Follow the algorithm
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,75 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |