Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Why Trump Lost and How? A Rhetorical Explanation

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3757602
AutoresRoderick P Hart (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, autor correspondente)
Ano2022
Volume66
Fascículo1
Páginas7-27
Data de publicação2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002764221996760
OpenAlexW3134021676
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas13
Referências citadas23

Discovering why the 2020 election turned out as it did will, given the complexities of American politics, take considerable time. Discovering how Trump lost and how Biden won will take longer. This article presents an initial foray in the latter direction by subjecting the rhetoric of the campaign to computerized language analysis via the DICTION program. In doing so, this study is the most recent outgrowth of the Campaign Mapping Project, begun at the University of Texas in Austin in 1995 and designed to produce comparative rhetorical data about presidential campaigns from 1948 to the present. The argument being made here is that Donald Trump lost the election by making excessive use of what Richard Hofstadter calls the Paranoid Style. In addition, Trump made exaggerated claims about abstract and unprovable conspiracies, all of which seemed derivative to voters worried about their health and their jobs in 2020. Joe Biden, in contrast, stressed Commonality-the need for shared purpose during a dangerous and dispiriting time. Biden also spoke directly of and to the people, thereby taking a page out of Trump's own 2016 playbook. In many ways, Donald Trump's self-preoccupations made him blind to the needs of the electorate, a habit that developed over the course of his presidency and that ultimately cost him his job

Argument (complex analysis) · Art · Diction · Linguistics · Literature · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Presidential election · Presidential system · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Style (visual arts) · Law · Philosophy · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics

  • « “Le jour où la démocratie meurt” ? Équilibre des pouvoirs et démocratie aux États-Unis à l’ère du “big lie” »

    Open Access•Saïd Ouaked•Fédérer Langues Altérités…•2024

  • Connecting the American People

    Open Access•Louise Anglès d’Auriac•Transatlantica•2024

  • Assessing Wartime Leaders' Motives

    Open Access•Anton Oleinik•Conflict Resolution Quarterly•2025

  • On measurement of distances between texts in dictionary-based content analysis

    Open Access•Anton Oleinik•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • Charismatic rhetoric, perceptions of charisma and narcissism, and voting behavior

    Open Access•Taís Barreto, Ethlyn A Williams et al.•Leadership•2023

  • Putting Discourses About the War in Ukraine on a Map

    Open Access•Anton Oleinik•International Politics•2024

  • Donald Trump's Words

    Open Access•Nikita Savin, Daniel Treisman•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Feeling protected

    Carol Johnson•Emotions and Society•2021

  • Radiating Truthiness

    Open Access•Henrique Sposito•Political Studies•2024

  • On Rhetorical Paramnesia

    Open Access•Ryan Neville-Shepard•American Behavioral Scientist•2025

  • Are U.S. Presidents Becoming Less Rhetorically Complex? Evaluating the Integrative Complexity of Joe Biden and Donald Trump in Historical Context

    Open Access•Lucian Gideon Conway, Alivia Zubrod•Journal of Language and Social…•2022

  • Dissatisfied democrats, but democrats nonetheless?” Unraveling the democratic paradox between populism and preference for alternative political systems

    Open Access•Kostas Papaioannou, Sam Slewe et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Masks and Emasculation

    Open Access•Meredith Neville-Shepard•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • The age of Twitter

    Brian L Ott•Critical Studies in Mass…•2017

  • Make America Great Again

    Jason A Edwards, Jason Edwards•Communication Quarterly•2018

  • The Twitter Presidency

    Brian L Ott, Greg Dickinson•Twitter Presidency•2019

  • Donald J. Trump and the Rhetoric of White Ambivalence

    Casey Ryan Kelly•Rhetoric and Public Affairs•2020

  • Obama, Trump, and Reflections on the Rhetoric of Political Change

    Denise M Bostdorff•Rhetoric and Public Affairs•2017

  • Campaign talk

    Open Access•Gary Aguiar, Gary G Aguiar•The Social Science Journal•2001

  • Polls and Elections Trump, Twitter, and Public Dissuasion

    Open Access•Matthew R Miles, Donald P Haider-Markel et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Donald Trump and the Return of the Paranoid Style

    Open Access•Roderick P Hart•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • The Power of the Presidency to Hurt”

    Open Access•Mary E Stuckey•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Donald J. Trump and the rhetoric of ressentiment

    Casey Ryan Kelly•Quarterly Journal of Speech•2020

  • Reckless Rhetoric? Compliance Pessimism and International Order in the Age of Trump

    Allison Carnegie, Austin Carson•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • In search of enemies

    Open Access•Jonny Hall•Politics•2021

  • Ambiguous specificity

    Open Access•Gustav Meibauer•Politics•2021

  • Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•J Eric Oliver, James E Oliver et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • The "Tweet Politics" of President Trump

    Ramona Kreis•Journal of Language and Politics•2017

  • Going negative

    Open Access•Andrew S Ro, Andrew S Ross et al.•Language & Communication•2020

  • Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction

    Open Access•Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Doron Taussig•Political Science Quarterly•2017

Obras citantes distintas13
Citações por ano2,6
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2025 (5)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 13
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae