Closing the Knowledge Gap

One mechanism by which citizens learn about candidates and issues is through watching presidential debates. Some scholars have raised concerns that these events, however, disproportionately benefit those already high in political knowledge more so than others with lesser knowledge levels. We hypothesize that knowledge begets knowledge because it prompts a constructive cognitive process that results from elaboration and reflection. We test this hypothesis in an experiment that also considers whether issue priming could help mitigate the deficit that those lower in political sophistication have when viewing campaign events. Participants ( N = 543) watched a 9-minute segment focusing on economic issues drawn from the first 2020 presidential debate between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joseph Biden. Half of the participants were randomly assigned to an issue priming condition and viewed the debate segment after reading a narrative text on economic policy, and the other half read an unrelated text. The study presents a model that reveals the following: (a) cognitive elaboration mediates the relationship between prior political knowledge and learning from a campaign event, (b) providing citizens with background issue-related knowledge produces a similar elaborative effect as did preexisting political knowledge, and (c) participants demonstrate greater political opinion articulation following this enhanced elaboration leading to more learning. The implications for cultivating a knowledgeable democratic electorate are discussed

Narrative · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Priming (agriculture) · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

• The Democratic Value of Strategic Game Reporting and Uncivil Talk

  Open Access•Lindita Camaj, Lea Hellmueller et al.•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2024

  Incluir item

• Fostering response efficacy

  Freddie J Jennings, Darby Gilliland et al.•Communication and Democracy•2026

  Incluir item

• A Tale of Two Debates

  R L Holbert, Huma Rasheed et al.•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2026

  Incluir item

• Issue and Image Learning in Debates

  Open Access•Steven D Gardiner, Freddie J Jennings et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2026

  Incluir item

• Developmental Research, Public Policy, and the Ecology of Childhood

  Urie Bronfenbrenner•Child Development•1974

  Incluir item

• Talk or Conversation? Dimensions of Interpersonal Discussion and Their Implications for Participatory Democracy

  Open Access•Dietram A Scheufele•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2000

  Incluir item

• Learning from Presidential Debates

  Open Access•Freddie J Jennings, Benjamin R Warner et al.•Communication Studies•2020

  Incluir item

• A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates

  William L Benoit, Glenn J Hansen et al.•Communication Monographs•2003

  Incluir item

• Learning About the Candidates

  Arthur H Miller, Michael Mackuen•Public Opinion Quarterly•1979

  Incluir item

• Presidential debates as focal points for campaign arguments

  Diana Prentice Carlin•Political Communication•1992

  Incluir item

• Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

  Open Access•Nassim Tabri, Craig M Elliott•Canadian Graduate Journal of…•2012

  Incluir item

• Presidential Election Campaigns and American Democracy

  Open Access•Michael Pfau, J Brian Houston et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2005

  Incluir item

• Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models

  Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ro et al.•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1961

  Incluir item

• Do Televised Debates Affect Image Perception More Than Issue Knowledge? A Study of the First 1992 Presidential Debate

  Open Access•Jian-Hua Zhu, Jonathan J H Zhu et al.•Human Communication Research•1994

  Incluir item