Articulating Populism in Place

A Relational Comparison of Kirchnerism in Argentina

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3775239
AutoresSam Halvorsen (0000-0001-8215-6946, Queen Mary University of London), Fernanda Valeria Torres (0000-0002-2046-0974, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas)
Ano2022
Volume112
Fascículo8
Páginas2195-2211
Data de publicação2022-11-17
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAnnals of the American Association of Geographers (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2469-4452 • E-ISSN: 2469-4460
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/24694452.2022.2053652
OpenAlexW4280560543
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas10
Referências citadas62

How are populist movements articulated in place, and what political tensions can arise when they mobilize across scales? Despite the historical significance of particular places for populist movements (e.g., countryside or city), much populist scholarship remains trapped in a national lens, and geographical analyses are only starting to take seriously place-based articulations. Drawing on Gillian Hart's Gramscian approach, we understand articulation as a dual process of cojoining and resignifying that unfolds through geographically situated practices and language. We extend this by paying attention to actors of populist mobilization, political parties, and social movements, examining their articulation of political subjectivities and antagonisms through place-based contexts, thus providing an analytical framework for studying populism. Considering the national-popular movement of Kirchnerism, our analysis unfolds through a relational comparison of two contrasting places in Argentina-its wealthy capital city and the impoverished province of Jujuy-moving dialectically across different scales, considering contradictions between local and national mobilizations of Kircherism while also contextualizing these in regional and global process. In so doing, we demonstrate that a geographically sensitive analysis of populist conjunctures provides insights into the success and failures of national popular movements. Specifically, place-based movements face dilemmas between gaining support and autonomy from national counterparts, whereas national popular movements both depend on and are threatened by local populist success

Articulation (sociology · Autonomy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Scholarship · Social movement · Sociology · Politics and Society in Latin America · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics