Computational Cartographic Recognition
Identifying Maps, Geographic Regions, and Projections from Images Using Machine Learning
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3775765 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jialin Li (0000-0002-1787-4236, The Ohio State University), N Xiao (0000-0002-6585-6294, The Ohio State University) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 113 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1243-1267 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-05-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Annals of the American Association of Geographers (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2469-4452 • E-ISSN: 2469-4460 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/24694452.2023.2166010 |
| OpenAlex | W4322763383 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 54 |
Map reading is a challenging task for computer programs. This article explores how artificial intelligence and machine learning methods can be used to understand maps, an area we broadly refer to as computational cartographic recognition. Specifically, we use machine learning methods to (1) identify whether an image is a map, (2) recognize the geographic region on the map, and (3) recognize the projection used on the map. Four machine learning models—support vector machine, multilayer perceptrons, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) developed from scratch using our own architecture (CNNS), and pretrained CNN models through transfer learning (CNNT)—are applied in these tasks. We use 2,200 online map images, 500 nonmap images, and 1,050 synthetic map images to train and evaluate the models. Results show that the CNNT models achieve the highest performance among all models, with an accuracy rate above 90 percent for the tasks. The CNNS models come in second. We also conduct a round of stress tests using 3,600 additional synthetic maps where the shape and layout are systematically distorted and test if the models can still identify the maps and recognize the region and projection on the maps. The results of the stress tests show that the models can reliably recognize some of the modified maps even when exhibiting performance inferior to even random models for other maps. This unpredictable nature of the methods when applied to maps that are not represented in the training data suggests both promises and limitations of the current machine learning approaches to cartographic recognition
Artificial neural network · Convolutional neural network · Machine learning · Perceptron · Support vector machine · Transfer of learning · Computer Science · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Historical Geography and Cartography · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Artificial Intelligence
AI Ethics
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Machine learning
Libsvm
GeoAI
Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size
Support-Vector Networks
A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance
Information and Persuasion
Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty
Deep learning
How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations
Towards a Multiobjective View of Cartographic Design
Elements of viral cartography
Maps, Mapping, Modernity
Thirty Five Years of Computer Cartograms
The ethics of algorithms
Historical Links between Cartography and Art
Principles of Cartography
The Rectangular Statistical Cartogram
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |