Lévy-Bruhl and Modes of Thought

In this paper I examine the relevance of Lévy Bruhl's work for contemporary anthropological theory. Starting with a brief summary of his writings, I go on to explore his concept of primitive thought, showing how his ideas were influenced by Durkheim and depended mainly on the notion of collective representations. However, Lévy-Bruhl's use of this concept, while Durkheimian in its sources, differed from Durkheim's original usage. It is this difference which I explore following suggestions by Waismann and other logicians interested in non-standard logics. I assess the response to Lévy-Bruhl's ideas both by his contemporaries and by more recent anthropologists, pointing out that much of their criticism is based on a misunderstanding of his position, combined with a lack of awareness on the part of most anthropologists of non-standard, alternative logics. Finally I argue the importance of Lévy-Bruhl's questions (but not his answers) for anthropologists interested in exploring modes of thought found in social structures which legitimate marked ambiguities in discourse and practice, and whose formal logical models do not conform to the aristotelian naradigm

Criticism · Epistemology · Political science · Relevance (law) · Sociology · Emile Durkheim and Sociology · Law · Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis · Philosophy · Semiotics and Representation Studies

• Metaphor, Myth, and Symbol in the Grain of Time

  Chris Sinha•Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic…•2023

  Incluir item

• Jung and Lévy-Bruhl

  Open Access•Robert A Segal•Journal of Analytical Psychology•2007

  Incluir item

• World’s earliest ground-edge axe production coincides with human colonisation of Australia

  Peter Hiscock, Sue O''Connor et al.•Australian Archaeology•2016

  Incluir item

• Ritual and the Constitution of Social Structure

  Open Access•Raul Pertierra•Mankind•2009

  Incluir item

• Being In Two Minds

  John Morton•Canberra Anthropology•1986

  Incluir item

• Primitive man as philosopher

  Paul Radin•Primitive man as philosopher•1927

  Incluir item

• The foundations of primitive thought

  C R Hallpike•The foundations of primitive…•1979

  Incluir item

• Theories of primitive religion

  E E Evans-Pritchard•Theories of primitive religion•1966

  Incluir item

• Witchcraft and sorcery

  Max Marwick•Witchcraft and sorcery•1990

  Incluir item

• Reconnaissances

  Rodney Needham•Reconnaissances•1980

  Incluir item

• How I See Philosophy

  Open Access•Friedrich Waismann, Rom Harré•How I See Philosophy•1968

  Incluir item

• Language, Thought, and Reality

  Joseph M Foley, Marc Tunzi et al.•The Hastings Center Report•1989

  Incluir item

• Knowing One's Motives

  Open Access•Nigel Mackay•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1979

  Incluir item

• Purity and Danger

  Douglas M Staff, Mary Douglas et al.•Purity and Danger•2013

  Incluir item

• Philosophical investigations

  Ludwig Wittgenstein•Philosophical investigations•1974

  Incluir item

• The Division of Labour in Society

  Open Access•George Simpson, Emile Durkheim et al.•Durkheim•1984

  Incluir item

• Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit

  Open Access•J Tambiah, S J Tambiah•Ethnology•1969

  Incluir item

• The Elementary Forms of Religious Life

  Emile Durkheim, Carol Cosman et al.•The Elementary Forms Of Religious…•2009

  Incluir item

• Alternative Logic in 'Primitive Thought

  David E Cooper•Man•1975

  Incluir item

• Why is the Cassowary Not a Bird? A Problem of Zoological Taxonomy Among the Karam of the New Guinea Highlands

  Ralph Bulmer•Man•1967

  Incluir item