Factors determining substitute behavior and the overt expression of aggression

Four hypotheses bearing on factors determining substitute behavior and degree of overt aggression have been deduced from the general laws of frustration and of learning, and evidence gathered from a questionnaire designed to permit standardized recall of real-life situations has been presented to substantiate them. Several generalizations may be made: The frequency of substitute responses varies positively with the strength of anticipatory responses to punishment-for-being-aggressive. The frequency of substitute responses varies inversely with the strength of instigation to the frustrated goal response. Overtness of aggression varies inversely with the amount of punishment anticipated as a consequence of such behavior. Overtness of aggression varies positively with the strength of instigation to the frustrated goal response. Overt aggression is more satisfying than non-overt aggression or substitute responses in the sample frustrating situations used in this study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

Aggression · Developmental psychology · Expression (computer science) · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Frustration and aggression.

  John Dollard, Neal E Miller et al.•1939

  Incluir item

• Social learning and clinical psychology.

  Julian B Rotter•1954

  Incluir item

• A Phenomenological Study of Mental Health Enhancement in Taekwondo Training

  Open Access•Wonchul Bing, Soojung Kim et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  Incluir item

• A functional classification of verbal reactions to experimentally induced failure

  David C Mcclelland, F S Apicella et al.•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1945

  Incluir item

• The role of communication in the reduction of interpersonal hostility

  John W Thibaut, John Thibaut et al.•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1952

  Incluir item

• Aggression as a function of the attack and the attacker

  Frances K Graham, Wanda A Charwat et al.•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1951

  Incluir item

• Social norms, arbitrariness of frustration, and status of the agent of frustration in the frustration-aggression hypothesis

  Arthur R Cohen•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1955

  Incluir item

• The effect of threat on perceptual affect in a group

  Marvin Zuckerman•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1951

  Incluir item

• Physical aggression in relation to different frustrations

  Arnold H Bu, Arnold H Buss•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1963

  Incluir item

• A hot new way to measure aggression

  Open Access•Joel D Lieberman, Sheldon Solomon et al.•Aggressive Behavior•1999

  Incluir item

• Physical aggression as a function of strength of frustration and instrumentality of aggression

  Open Access•Robert J Thompson, Ralph H Kolstoe•Journal of Research in Personality•1974

  Incluir item

• Some Social and Psychological Situations Related to Change in Attitude

  Open Access•Jeanne Watson•Human Relations•1950

  Incluir item

• Exposure to an aggressive model and apparent probability of retaliation from the victim as determinants of adult aggressive behavior

  Open Access•Robert A Baron•Journal of Experimental Social…•1971

  Incluir item

• Psychology and aggression

  Open Access•Elton B Mcneil•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1959

  Incluir item

• Governmental Coerciveness and Political Instability

  Open Access•Gregory B Markus, Betty A Nesvold•Comparative Political Studies•1972

  Incluir item

• Normative and Deviant Violence from a Conflict Perspective

  J Ball-Rokeach, Sandra J Ball‐rokeach et al.•Social Problems•1980

  Incluir item