Transcending Geography
The United Kingdom's Accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3948143 |
|---|---|
| Autores | María García (0000-0001-6019-639X, Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies, University of Bath (UK), Bath, UK, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-24 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-10-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Geopolitics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1465-0045 • E-ISSN: 1557-3028 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14650045.2024.2411339 |
| OpenAlex | W4403488650 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 35 |
Immediately after Brexit, the UK started negotiations to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The decision is puzzling. First, Brexiteers lauded regaining sovereignty as a key benefit of Brexit, yet the UK Government sought accession to another trade grouping (albeit one far more restrained in regulation and supranationalism). Secondly, CPTPP is a Trans-Pacific project, the UK is not located in that geographic region. UK accession to CPTPP symbolises an operationalisation of the spatial imaginaries of a ‘free-trading’ ‘Global Britain’ that emerged during Brexit. It represents an illustrative example of a state reshaping its boundaries within a ‘space of flows’ where economic interactions and the rules that order these transcend national territories and geographic proximity. This paper draws on UK government and CPTPP documents related to the accession process to establish how the parties understood the process and the reconfiguration of spatial dynamics and redefinition of the TP part of CPTPP to include the UK. It pays particular attention to the development in the discourses of imaginaries of communities of rules and norms as being more significant than geographic considerations in determining the geographic reach of a regional integration initiative like CPTPP. The paper argues that it was this imaginary of a community of standards and free-trade values that justified the recasting the UK as ‘belonging’ in this regional grouping and enabled this new spatial projection for the UK and CPTPP
Accession · Economic geography · Economic history · Economics · Economy · European union · General partnership · Geography · International trade · Kingdom · Political science · Regional science · Canadian Policy and Governance · Global trade and economics · Island Studies and Pacific Affairs · Law · Geology
Basic Content Analysis
Brexit
New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗
Gravity Equations
Policy and Practice Spatial imaginaries
Cultural Backlash
Brexit Geographies
Torn Between Institutionalisation & Judicialisation
The dilemma of Brexit
Trump’s trade wars
Post-Brexit Trade Policy Autonomy as Pyrrhic Victory
The Organic Crisis of the British State
Bound by Gravity or Living in a ‘Post Geography Trading World’? Expert Knowledge and Affective Spatial Imaginaries in the Construction of the UK’s Post-Brexit Trade Policy
Brexit and the Politics of UK Growth Models
Geographies of Brexit and its aftermath
Post-geography worlds, new dominions, left behind regions, and ‘other’ places
The UK’s new free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific
Weaponized Interdependence
European Cities, the Informational Society, and the Global Economy
Transcending land–sea dichotomies through strategic spatial planning
UK‐US Trade Relations and ‘Global Britain’
Assessing the Implications of Schrems Ii for Eu–us Data Flow
Brexit geopolitics
The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy
Post-Brexit trade policy in the UK
Political controversy about international economic agreements
Spatial Imaginaries Research in Geography
Territory, Place, Flow, and Scale
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |