Bordering Borderscapes
Australia's Use of Humanitarian Aid and Border Security Support to Immobilise Asylum Seekers
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3948534 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Josh Watkins (0000-0003-1003-5189, Geography Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 958-983 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-10-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Geopolitics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1465-0045 • E-ISSN: 1557-3028 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14650045.2017.1312350 |
| OpenAlex | W2608687205 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 24 |
This article documents Australia’s use of border security support and humanitarian aid as border externalisations immobilising asylum seekers as far from Australia as possible. The Australian Government frames border securitisation through regionalism, as an effort to achieve a “regional solution” to asylum seeking irregular migration. Correspondingly, scholars have documented Australia’s externalisations in Southeast Asia and the Pacific. However, Australia’s efforts are not regionally circumscribed and this article analyses the spatial and temporal flexibility of Australia’s border externalisations; Australia’s strategy of targeting borderscapes of asylum seeking as they emerge and change. In doing so, the article examines how the Australian Government has assembled externalisations in South Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa. Australia’s use of humanitarian aid to make places housing asylum seekers more hospitable, yet confining, to the displaced is detailed. Also analysed is Australia’s border security support to source countries and countries of first asylum to immobilise asylum seekers. The article demonstrates that Australia has sought to manifest not only a territorial buffer zone in Southeast Asia, but use border externalisations in the Middle East, South Asia, and North Africa to secure places and displaced populations. This is argued to be a preventative strategy of risk management designed to preempt future asylum geographies and forge extraterritorial migration control
Development economics · Economic growth · Economy · Ethnology · Humanitarian aid · Humanitarian crisis · Irregular migration · Political science · Refugee · Repatriation · Sociology · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Affective Borderscapes
La externalización de las fronteras en Australia y en la UE
Mobility spaces
Irregular migration, borders, and the moral geographies of migration management
Double-layer deterrence
Embracing complexity in ‘Southern’ migration governance
The ‘street politics’ of migrant il/legality
Political geography III
The nexus between maternity care and bordering practices
Forced migration management and politics of scale
Borderland Regime
Mapping Illegality
Humanitarian Geographies of Migrant Return
Covert Borderwork
After the fires? Climate change and security in Australia
The carceral wet
The Geopolitics of Return Migration in the International System
The Shifting Landscape of International Resettlement
Corrupt(ing) Borders
Categorising anti-asylum Seeker Sentiment through a Regime of Securitisation
Tourism Development on China's Northwestern Border
Making Sense of Borderscapes
Containing futures
Migration information campaigns
| Obras citantes distintas | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3,43 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 22 |