Reforma do Ensino Médio no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil)
Alinhamentos E Resistências
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3949131 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ângela Both Chagas (0000-0002-6408-7331, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Maria Beatriz Luce (0000-0003-1842-164X, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Páginas | 1-21 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Praxis Educativa (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1809-4031 • E-ISSN: 1809-4309 |
| Editora | Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5212/praxeduc.v.15.14653.022 |
| OpenAlex | W2998012210 |
| Idioma | PT |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
In this article, we present an analysis of the first steps on the implementation of the Brazilian High School reform (Law no. 13.415/2017) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, between September 2016 and December 2018. Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field, we examined strategies and positions of two agents in the educational field: the State Department of Education and the State Council on Education. Through a document analysis we found the state Department aligned to the Ministry of Education guidelines, reproducing education concepts bound to hegemonic interests in the economic field. Whereas the state Council pursued a resistance strategy, initially rejecting the content of Provisional Measure no. 746/2016, but after it became law, by resisting within the norm, playing the game within the field to minimize its impacts on students. Keywords: High School reform. Law no. 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul
Political science · Education and Public Policy · Education Pedagogy and Practices · Rural and Ethnic Education
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,17 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |