Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Taylor and Rousseau on Republican Freedom and Political Fragmentation

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3969733
AutoresAndrew Tsz Wan Hung (0000-0002-3065-297X, College of Professional and Continuing Education, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 8 Hung Lok Road, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China, autor correspondente)
Ano2022
Volume27
Fascículo6
Páginas601-616
Data de publicação2022-08-18
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe European Legacy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10848770.2022.2066818
OpenAlexW4224315770
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas19

Both Rousseau and Charles Taylor are well-known for their support of positive freedom. However, Taylor criticizes Rousseau’s positive freedom and the general will for inducing the worst form of homogenizing tyranny in the French Revolution. Taylor prefers Tocquevillian republicanism because he claims that Rousseau’s general will fails to acknowledge the fact of pluralism. In this article, I compare Rousseau’s and Taylor’s positions on republicanism and argue that Taylor’s positive freedom is very similar to Rousseau’s. Both argue for an exercise-concept of freedom with moral judgment; both reject atomism and argue for some kind of communitarian self. Although Rousseau’s philosophy has several shortcomings, I claim that Taylor’s criticism of Rousseau’s general will is unwarranted, in view of the fact that the problem of political polarization in contemporary democracies seems to show that Tocquevillian republicanism, which Taylor supports, cannot sustain itself in the long run. I conclude that a slightly revised version of Rousseau’s concept of the general will in terms of collective intentionality can deepen our understanding of the political problems besetting Western democracies and the need to fight against political fragmentation

Criticism · Epistemology · General Will · Individualism · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • A Case for Communitarian Meritocracy

    Open Access•Andrew Tsz Wan Hung•Fudan Journal of the Humanities…•2025

  • Hard Paternalism and Confucian Familism

    Open Access•Andrew Tsz Wan Hung•Fudan Journal of the Humanities…•2024

  • Rousseau and Tlaxcala

    Andrew Chang, Arturo Chang et al.•Polity•2025

  • Rousseau

    Robert Wokler•Rousseau•2001

  • Modern Social Imaginaries

    Charles Taylor•Modern Social Imaginaries•2004

  • The Ethics of Authenticity

    Charles Taylor•The Ethics of Authenticity•1992

  • Liberty

    Isaiah Berlin, Edited by Henry Hardy•Liberty•2002

  • Rousseau

    Joshua Cohen•Rousseau•2010

  • We-intentions

    Open Access•Raimo Tuomela, Kaarlo Miller•Philosophical Studies•1988

  • Philosophy and the Human Sciences

    Charles Taylor•Philosophical Papers•1985

  • Philosophical Arguments

    Open Access•M J Inwood•Philosophical Books•1996

  • Collective Intentions and Actions

    John R Searle•Intentions in Communication•1990

  • Freedom and Equality

    Open Access•M Patricia Marchak, K Dixon•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1987

  • Rousseau

    Andrew Levine, James Miller•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1985

  • Shared Cooperative Activity

    Michael E Bratman•The Philosophical Review•1992

  • Essays in Philosophy and Its History

    Open Access•Wilfrid Sellars, Wifrid Sellars•Essays in Philosophy and Its…•1974

  • Authenticity, Justice, and Virtue in Taylor and Rousseau

    Joseph R Reisert, Joseph Reisert•Polity•2000

  • The Force of Freedom

    Open Access•Steven G Affeldt•Political Theory•1999

  • Misreading One's Sources

    Open Access•Jonathan Marks•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • Autonomy and Common Good

    Michael J Thompson•International Journal of…•2017

  • Understanding the General Will

    Richard Dagger•The Western Political Quarterly•1981

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano1,5
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2025 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae