Joseph Brodsky and the Aesthetic Origins of Ethics

In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech in 1987, the Russian-born American poet Joseph Brodsky argued that aesthetics is the mother of ethics. However, there is an ambiguity in his use of the term aesthetics. In the first part of this article, I distinguish between Brodsky’s narrow use of aesthetics, which refers to problems of beauty, and the broader sense, which refers to the cognitive function of sensibility and feeling. I then suggest that good sense can be made of the claim about the origins of ethics only if we employ the broader sense of aesthetics. The second part draws on examples from Brodsky and the American poet Jorie Graham to illustrate the ways in which the feelings generated by human sensuous receptivity transform the world from a meaningless physical system into meaningful sets of life-valuable relationships. The third part sharpens this conclusion by considering the conditions under which the world can appear to be meaningless. In the final section I link Brodsky’s poetic responsiveness to the world to John McMurtry’s philosophical analysis of “the felt side of being.” Poetic evocation and philosophical argument are two approaches to the same problem which, when brought together, provide a comprehensive explanation of why aesthetics is the mother of ethics

Aesthetics · Ambiguity · Art · Beauty · Epistemology · Evocation · Feeling · Literature · Poetry · Sensibility · Sociology · Philosophy · Visual Culture and Art Theory

• Critique of Pure Reason

  Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of Pure Reason•1998

  Incluir item

• Reflections on Poetry

  Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten, Karl Aschenbrenner et al.•Reflections on Poetry•1954

  Incluir item

• There Are No Purely Aesthetic Obligations

  Open Access•Jason Dyck, John Dyck•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2021

  Incluir item