Diderot on Nature and Pantomime

The article examines Diderot’s view of the inconstancy of nature and its corollaries, the most obvious of which is the recognition of the impossibility of philosophy and natural history. For, if everything in nature is in a state of flux, no theory can keep up with its changes, reflect on them and capture anything more than an isolated moment. Diderot’s conception of nature has important consequences for his aesthetic theory. If the goal of the fine arts is to imitate nature, and if everything in nature undergoes constant change, does it not mean that art—no less than philosophy and natural history—is also impossible? By focusing on Diderot’s novel Rameau’s Nephew (1805), I argue that the lesson of the numerous mimes its eponymous hero performs in the novel is that the dynamics of nature can perhaps only be captured by mime rather than on canvas or in stone, both of which, as Diderot puts it, can represent only a fleeting moment

Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Epistemology · HERO · Impossibility · Literature · Nephew and niece · The arts · Visual arts · French Literature and Criticism · Historical and Literary Analyses · Historical and Literary Studies · History · Law · Philosophy

• Diderot et la question de la forme

  Colas Duflo•Diderot et la question de la forme•1999

  Incluir item

• Diderot et le matérialisme

  Jean-Claude Bourdin•Diderot•1998

  Incluir item

• Philosophical papers and letters

  Open Access•Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Leroy E Loemker•Philosophical papers and letters•1976

  Incluir item