The foreign policy process in Libya
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3979442 |
|---|---|
| Autores | George Joffe (University of Cambridge), Emanuela Paoletti (University of Oxford) |
| Ano | 2011 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 183-213 |
| Data de publicação | 2011-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The Journal of North African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1362-9387 • E-ISSN: 1743-9345 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13629387.2010.526288 |
| OpenAlex | W2024516852 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
The policy process in Libya is complex and intensely personalised around the figure of the Libyan leader, even if it also relies on a structured consultation process. Libya's foreign policy fits within this paradigm as well, as our research amongst Libyan policy-makers has demonstrated. Yet, despite its apparent unpredictability, it abides by three basic principles that interact with each other: opportunistic constancy, national self-interest and ideological commitment. Whilst the correlation between the first two elements is linear and progressive, their correlation with the third is inverted and retrogressive although they can condition and shape it as well. Actual relations form four inter-connected conceptual circles covering the Arab world, Africa, the West (Europe and America) and the BRICs (Russia, China, Latin America and Asia). Thus relations with the Arab world and Africa are suffused with ideological import alongside Libya's pragmatic objectives in Africa, whilst with Europe and America they are conditioned by pragmatic constancy based on oil and international acceptance. With the world of the BRICs, some of Libya's old visions of anti-imperialism have resurfaced but commercial concerns still dominate interrelationships. The personalised nature of foreign policy decisions has been powerfully reflected in recent years in Libya's bilateral relationships, as Bulgaria, Britain, Canada and Switzerland have recently discovered. They reflect a deep insistence that Libya and its leader should be taken at their own evaluation. Where this has not happened, Libyan displeasure has been manifest, the degree of displeasure being tempered only by a pragmatic and opportunistic consideration of possible adverse consequences. Overall, however, the constant and underlying theme since the 1990s has been regaining international acceptance, one which, even if its content is diametrically opposed to the patterns of that past, reflects the objectives of the 1970s and 1980s as well
China · Development economics · Economics · Economy · Foreign policy · Ideology · Latin Americans · National interest · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Sociology · Vision · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security
Managing the global ambitions of allies
Libia y la agresión contra Gaza. Fervor popular y maniobras oficiales en la sombra
The entangled legacies of empire
Between defeating “the warlord” and defending “the blue homeland”
Languages in Libya
Towards a 'democratic knowledge' turn? Knowledge production in the age of the Arab Spring
Differentiation and diffusion
Eichmann in Jerusalem
The Theory Of Social And Economic Organization
Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries
Libya
Qadhafi's Libya, 1969-1994
Qaddafi's World Design
Libya and the United States
Libya's Foreign Policy in North Africa
Libya and Europe
The European Union, Democracy and Counter‐Terrorism in the Maghreb
Libya's Saharan destiny
Libya since 1969
Historical Dictionary of Libya
Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,64 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |