Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

From the February 17 Revolution to Benghazi

Rewriting History for Political Gain

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3979493
AutoresRonald Bruce St John (autor correspondente)
Ano2016
Volume21
Fascículo3
Páginas357-378
Data de publicação2016-05-26
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe Journal of North African Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1362-9387 • E-ISSN: 1743-9345
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13629387.2016.1152189
OpenAlexW2334978625
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas12

In February 2011, peaceful demonstrations in Benghazi and other Libyan cities in support of additional housing, more jobs, and a better way life quickly turned into demands for regime change after security forces employed deadly force in an effort to subdue the protesters. As the February 17 Revolution unfolded, the better equipped and trained security forces of the Qaddafi regime soon bested inexperienced and poorly armed rebel units, threatening to retake Benghazi and engage in acts of retribution similar to those the regime had employed in the past to punish acts of dissent or revolt. In response, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1973, authorising member states to take ‘all necessary measures’ to protect civilians under threat of attack. The policies of the Qaddafi regime in the years before the February 17 Revolution and in the early weeks of the revolt thoroughly justified the UN-supported military intervention that began in mid-March 2011; nevertheless, some academics, journalists, and politicians have distorted events in this time frame to argue that it was not a model intervention but a model failure. Kindred spirits have seized on a contrived, misleading analysis to challenge the foreign policy legacy of the Obama administration and the role in Libya of then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Historical revisionism enjoys a long and cherished tradition; however, a selective rendering of events for political gain undermines the democratic process in both Libya and the USA and threatens to distort future policy decisions on Libya and other countries, replacing authoritarian regimes with democracies

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Dissent · Foreign policy · Intervention (counseling · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Global Political and Social Dynamics · Law

  • Rogue Libya's Long Road

    Lisa Anderson•Middle East Report•2006

  • The South

    Open Access•Henry Smith•2011 Libyan Uprisings and the…•2013

  • Q adhafi's C hanged P olicy

    Open Access•Mary‐Jane Deeb•Middle East Policy•2000

  • Libya

    Open Access•Alison Pargeter•Review of African Political Economy•2006

  • A Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing Nato's Libya Campaign

    Alan J Kuperman•International Security•2013

  • Qadhafi and Militant Islamism

    Yehudit Ronen•Middle Eastern Studies•2002

  • Qaddafi's World Design

    John C Campbell, Ronald Bruce St John•Foreign Affairs•1988

  • Qadhafi's comeback

    Asteris Huliaras•African Affairs•2001

  • Multiculturalism and democracy in North Africa

    Abderrahman Zouhir•The Journal of North African…•2015

  • Modern middle east authoritarianism

    Joseph Sassoon•The Journal of North African…•2015

  • Exit Gaddafi

    Richard Phelps•The Journal of North African…•2013

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae