Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3988475 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andrew Spencer (0000-0002-0687-9939), Marina Zaretskaya |
| Ano | 1998 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-40 |
| Data de publicação | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Editora | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.1 |
| OpenAlex | W2081314095 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 22 |
We argue that a large class of Russian prefixed verbs has essentially the same semantic structure as resultative constructions in English of the type paint the door green. We analyze both phenomena as instances of lexical subordination : although it is syntactically a secondary predicator, green expresses the primary (core ) semantic predication, while paint is a secondary subordinated semantic predicate. The expression therefore means cause to become green by painting. In the Russian vyteret' stol (wipe down the table, literally out-wipe table), the prefix vy- is semantically primary and the verb stem is subordinated. By virtue of this shared semantic structure, Russian prefixation can only access internal arguments (objects, or subjects of unaccusatives) and Russian prefixed verbs may support fake or unselected object constructions, akin to English resultatives such as drink the pub dry or sing oneself hoarse. From pisat' (write) we have ispisat' rucku (out-write pen, to run out of ink (of a pen)), in which the direct object pen is not selected by pisat' (write). Since these unselected objects are arguments of the prefixed verb complex, we conclude (with Goldberg 1995, against Levin and Rappaport Hovav 1995) that unselected objects in English resultatives are also arguments (of the construction). We extend our analysis to the steal/rob alternation and offering an explanation of why in some languages, verbs of manner of motion (e.g. run) behave like unergative verbs while the same verbs with directional complements/adjuncts (e.g. run into the room) behave like unaccusative verbs. We discuss the repercussions for the interpretation of notions such as complex predicate and construction
Linguistics · Object (grammar) · Predicate (mathematical logic) · Prefix · Resultative · Subordination (linguistics) · Verb · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Lexicography and Language Studies · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Small clause results revisited
Particle verbs in early Middle English
Degree Resultatives as Second-Order Constructions
New Perspectives in Language, Discourse and Translation Studies
Telicity, Change, and State
On the Representations of Motion Events
Building involuntary states in Slavic
Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP
Case and Aspect in Slavic
On the Diachrony of Complex Predicates in Dutch
Acquisition of English adjectival resultatives
On the argument structure of complex denominal verbs in Latin
A minimalist account of conflation processes
Stress Judgment and Production in English Derivation, and Word Reading in Adult Mandarin-Speaking English Learners
Argument structure and compositionality in idiomatic constructions
The typology of motion expressions revisited
On the Intensional Feel-Like Construction in Slovenian
Morphology, argument structure, and lexical semantics
How Complex Verbs Acquire Their Idiosyncratic Meanings
Compound headedness in Chinese
Particle Verbs and Argument Structure
Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,88 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2001 - 2024 (24) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 20 |