The status of purpose, reason, and intended endpoint in the typology of complex sentences
Implications for Layered Models of Clause Structure
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3989752 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jean‐christophe Verstraete (0000-0002-3576-9827, autor correspondente), Jean-Christophe Verstraete |
| Ano | 2008 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Data de publicação | 2008-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Editora | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling.2008.025 |
| OpenAlex | W1979132925 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 11 |
| Referências citadas | 19 |
This study argues that constructions of purpose, reason and intended endpoint have a special status in typologies of complex sentences, because they combine features of the adverbial domain and the complement domain. The feature they share with adverbial clauses is that they do not function as the object of the predicate of the main clause, but instead elaborate on its circumstances. The feature they share with complement clauses is that unlike other adverbial clauses they specify the mental state of some participant in the main clause, typically the agent. Evidence for this special status comes from two sources. On the one hand, it is shown that the recognition of a mental state relation is necessary in semantic terms, to distinguish the three constructions from semantically similar types in the adverbial domain, and to explain their exceptional behavior in terms of presupposition. On the other hand, it is also shown that the presence of such a mental state relation is crosslinguistically reflected in the formal make-up of the three construction types, specifically in the use of mood markers in the dependent clause, and in the use of conjunctions that are shared with the domain of represented speech. From a theoretical perspective, the intermediate status of constructions of purpose, reason and intended endpoint is important because it provides structural evidence for layered models of clause structure, specifically for the distinction between a description-related and an interaction-related layer of organization, and for a further subdivision of the interaction-related layer in terms of modal and illocutionary features
Adverbial · Dependent clause · Feature (linguistics) · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Non-finite clause · Predicate (mathematical logic) · Presupposition · Semantic property · Sentence · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
The Biblical Hebrew infinitive
Interrogatives of reason in Tibeto-Burman languages of Sichuan
Interrogatives of Liangshan Yi
Modification as a linguistic ‘relationship’
Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches
The discourse motivation for split-ergative alignment in Dutch nominalisations (and elsewhere)
In the beginning there was conversation
Grammaticalization reconciled
Result and Purpose relations with and without 'so
Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English
On Purpose and Causal Adverbial Clauses in Yaqui
The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2. Complex and Derived Constructions
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Causally related predications and the choice between parataxis and hypotaxis in Latin
Typologie Der Hypotaxe
Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation
A semiotic model for the description of levels in conjunction
Irrealis and the Subjunctive
A Grammar of Slave
The Yimas Language of New Guinea
Hua
A Grammar of Lezgian
Layers and operators in Functional Grammar
The Optative and *s- and *n- Conjugation Marking in Slave
Two types of coordination in clause combining
Initial and final position for adverbial clauses in English
The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements
Subjective and objective modality
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,73 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2011 - 2024 (14) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |