No impact of rural development policies? No synergies with CCTs? The Ifad-supported Gavião Project in Brazil

We estimate the impacts of an IFAD-supported rural development project (Pro-Gavião). Because public policies are frequently implemented simultaneously rather than in isolation, we also estimate the impacts of-and possible synergies with-the Brazilian conditional cash transfer (CCT) program Bolsa Família. Developed jointly by IFAD and the State Government of Bahia, Pro-Gavião was a rural development project in 13 contiguous municipalities between 1997 and 2005. Census tract level data were extracted for the analysis from the 1995-96 and 2006 Agricultural Censuses. The evaluation uses propensity score matching to construct a control group of untreated census tracts, and a difference-in-differences estimation to identify impacts. The outcomes analyzed include land productivity, agricultural income and child labor. Although Pro-Gavião involved significant investments in the region, the results suggest little if any program impact, or synergies between the two programs. The unexpected null findings are robust to alternative approaches to identifying the treated census tracts, matching techniques, and heterogeneity in several dimensions. We show that the lack of impacts is not driven by adverse rainfall in the treated communities, or the influence of other programs in the control communities. Alternative explanations for the null results are explored

Agriculture · Business · Cash transfers · Census · Conditional cash transfer · Economic growth · Economics · Estimation · Geography · Impact evaluation · International development · Matching (statistics) · Poverty · Propensity score matching · Socioeconomics · Statistics · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare

• Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching

  Open Access•Marco Caliendo, Sabine Kopeinig•SSRN Electronic Journal•2005

  Incluir item

• Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer

  Esther Duflo, Michael Kremer et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  Incluir item

• Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores

  Open Access•Sascha O Becker, Andrea Ichino•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2002

  Incluir item

• Nation Building Through Foreign Intervention

  Melissa Dell, Pablo Querubín•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2018

  Incluir item

• The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

  Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  Incluir item

• Salience and Taxation

  Raj Chetty, Adam Looney et al.•American Economic Review•2009

  Incluir item

• Transfers, Diversification and Household Risk Strategies

  Karen Macours, Patrick Premand et al.•2012

  Incluir item

• Social protection for enhanced food security in sub-Saharan Africa

  Open Access•Stephen Devereux•Food Policy•2015

  Incluir item

• The Impact of Bolsa Família on Schooling

  Open Access•Alan De Brauw, Daniel O Gilligan et al.•World Development•2015

  Incluir item

• The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on the Amount and Type of Child Labor

  Open Access•Ximena V Del Carpio, Norman Loayza et al.•World Development•2015

  Incluir item

• Multilateral assistance and sustainable development

  Open Access•Colin G BROWN, John W Longworth•World Development•1992

  Incluir item

• The impact of the Bolsa Escola/Familia conditional cash transfer program on enrollment, dropout rates and grade promotion in Brazil

  Open Access•Paul Glewwe, Ana Lucia Kassouf•Journal of Development Economics•2011

  Incluir item