The State of SHOT

The State of SHOTOrganizational Capacity in a Volunteer-based Organization Bruce E. Seely (bio) A community is like a ship; everyone ought to be prepared to take the helm. —Henrik Ibsen, An Enemy of the People (1882), act 1 Those who can, do. Those who can do more, volunteer. —Unknown Presidential addresses for scholarly organizations are a curious form of presentation. I am deeply honored to have the opportunity to add my own talk to the roster, and I explored several prior addresses in thinking about my approach. If there is a tradition within SHOT about these events, most presidents use the occasion to suggest underdeveloped or missing dimensions in our scholarship on the history of technology (a state-of-the-field review) or to propose ways that our research might be made more congruent with the wider intellectual currents of our time.1 Occasionally, as [End Page 508] exemplified by the 1998 address of Bruce Sinclair, a president focuses his or her talk on the health or initiatives of the society itself.2 My address falls into this latter category, for I wish to examine the state of SHOT from the specific perspective of the society’s organizational capability as a professional organization that depends on the efforts of volunteers. It is not an accident that I have come to focus on this question, although I never envisioned discussing SHOT as an organization when entering graduate school as a Hagley Fellow at the University of Delaware in 1975. My topic stems in large part from my experiences at Delaware with Eugene Ferguson, who showed his students by example that every scholar owes a commitment of time and energy to the organizations upon which we build professional careers. For Gene, the Society for the History of Technology certainly was a central focus, and he clearly envisioned that our commitment should involve more than attending SHOT’s annual meeting. My attempts to honor his example explain the unanticipated paths my career has followed. A key branch in that pathway came at the 1989 annual meeting in Sacramento, when Alex Roland informed me of my election to succeed him as SHOT’s secretary. During the next six years in that office, I discovered rather surprisingly the temperament and skills of an administrator, even while learning that serving as secretary could shape and inform my scholarship. I doubt, for example, if I would have chosen to explore SHOT’s early history had I not been curious about the work of other secretaries, especially SHOT’s founder, Mel Kranzberg.3 Gene’s example also influenced my decision to serve as the National Science Foundation’s program director for science and technology studies from 2000 to 2002. After I had the good fortune to receive a dissertation improvement grant from NSF in 1979, Gene had made sure I understood my indebtedness to NSF. But once again, this administrative position opened important opportunities for my intellectual and scholarly activities.4 The bottom line is that SHOT started me down the particular path of combining academic administration with being a historian of technology. The route culminated in my acceptance of positions as chair of the Department of Social Sciences and [End Page 509] then as dean of the College of Science and Arts, both at Michigan Tech. Taken together, these various opportunities and experiences have prompted me to focus my energy over the last two years on SHOT as an organization. So as my presidential term comes to a close, I wish to share with SHOT’s members my thoughts on this question. Attention to the state of SHOT may not be as common as conversation about the state of our field. But when such a discussion breaks out, it tends toward consideration of the excitement and stimulation of the papers at the annual meetings, the vibrancy of SHOT’s special-interest groups, and the quality of the papers in Technology and Culture.5 Something along these lines began again in 2013 when a group of dedicated members, including Gabrielle Hecht and Atsushi Akera, urged the executive council to take steps to ensure that SHOT was connected and contributed to the most exciting currents related to

Management · Medal · Media studies · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Politics · Presentation (obstetrics) · Presidential system · Public relations · Scholarship · Shot (pellet) · Sociology · State (computer science) · American Environmental and Regional History · American History and Culture · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Medicine

• The Military-Industrial Complex

  Brian Waddell, Alex Roland•The Journal of Military History•2002

  Incluir item

• Biotechnology and Utopia

  Brian Stableford•Critical Review of International…•2000

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1966)

  Jack Goodwin•Technology and Culture•1968

  Incluir item

• Let's Not Get Wrought Up about It

  Melvin Kranzberg•Technology and Culture•1984

  Incluir item

• Opening the Big Box

  Rosalind Williams, Rosalind H Williams•Technology and Culture•2007

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1999)

  Henry Lowood•Technology and Culture•2002

  Incluir item

• What Did We Expect SHOT to Wrought

  John B Rae•Technology and Culture•1984

  Incluir item

• Contributions to Bibliography in the History of Technology (Part I)

  Eugene S Ferguson•Technology and Culture•1962

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1983)

  Stephen H Cutcliffe, Christine M Roysdon et al.•Technology and Culture•1985

  Incluir item

• The Trail from Trail

  Arne Kaijser•Technology and Culture•2011

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1964)

  Jack Goodwin•Technology and Culture•1966

  Incluir item

• What SHOT Hath Wrought and What SHOT Hath Not

  John M Staudenmaier•Technology and Culture•1984

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1988)

  Henry Lowood, Judith A Adams et al.•Technology and Culture•1990

  Incluir item

• The Historian of Technology and Her True Country

  Steven W Usselman•Technology and Culture•2009

  Incluir item

• Bibliography of the History of Technology

  Thomas P Hughes, Eugene S Ferguson•Technology and Culture•1970

  Incluir item

• An Agenda for Shot

  Bruce Sinclair•Technology and Culture•1989

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1987)

  Stephen H Cutcliffe, Stephen H Cutclifee et al.•Technology and Culture•1989

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1973)

  Jack Goodwin•Technology and Culture•1975

  Incluir item

• SHOT, the History of Technology, and Engineering Education

  Bruce E Seely•Technology and Culture•1995

  Incluir item

• Current Bibliography in the History of Technology (1981)

  Jack Goodwin•Technology and Culture•1983

  Incluir item

• Technology Is to Science as Female Is to Male

  Ruth Schwartz Cowan•Technology and Culture•1996

  Incluir item

• Bibliography Is Social

  Stephen P Weldon•Isis•2013

  Incluir item