Compensation for State and Local Government Workers
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4029052 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Maury Gittleman (0000-0001-6669-2378, Research Economists, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C.), Brooks Pierce (Research Economists, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C.) |
| Ano | 2012 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 217-242 |
| Data de publicação | 2012-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The Journal of Economic Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0895-3309 • E-ISSN: 1944-7965 |
| Editora | American Economic Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1257/jep.26.1.217 |
| OpenAlex | W2137435752 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 10 |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
Are state and local government workers overcompensated? In this paper, we step back from the highly charged rhetoric and address this question with the two primary data sources for looking at compensation of state and local government workers: the Current Population Survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Employer Costs for Employee Compensation microdata collected as part of the National Compensation Survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In both data sets, the workers being hired in the public sector have higher skill levels than those in the private sector, so the challenge is to compare across sectors in a way that adjusts suitably for this difference. After controlling for skill differences and incorporating employer costs for benefits packages, we find that, on average, public sector workers in state government have compensation costs 3-10 percent greater than those for workers in the private sector, while in local government the gap is 10-19 percent. We caution that this finding is somewhat dependent on the chosen sample and specification, that averages can obscure broader differences in distributions, and that a host of worker and job attributes are not available to us in these data. Nonetheless, the data suggest that public sector workers, especially local government ones, on average, receive greater remuneration than observably similar private sector workers. Overturning this result would require, we think, strong arguments for particular model specifications, or different data
Business · Census · Demographic economics · Dismissal · Economic growth · Economics · Labour economics · Local government · Political science · Population · Private sector · Public sector · Public use · Remuneration · Wages and salaries · Workers' compensation · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Housing Market and Economics · Labor market dynamics and wage inequality · Law · Public Administration · Finance
Inter-Industry Wage Differentials Job Content and Unobserved Ability
Are U.S. teacher salaries competitive? Accounting for geography and the retransformation bias in logarithmic regressions
The intensity of Covid‐19 nonpharmaceutical interventions and labor market outcomes in the public sector
Are public sector workers in developing countries overpaid? Evidence from a new global dataset
Going subnational
Is the Public Sector Losing the Battle for Talent? Evidence from long French Panel Data
The New Great Debate about Unionism and Collective Bargaining in U.S. State and Local Governments
Public Pensions and Collective Bargaining Rights
Pay for Performance and Compensation Inequality
State Collective Bargaining Laws and Public-Sector Pay
Match Bias in Wage Gap Estimates Due to Earnings Imputation
Decomposition Methods in Economics
Smearing Estimate
Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets
Wage Discrimination
Reconciling the Old and New Census Bureau Education Questions
Evidence on the Employer Size-Wage Premium from Worker-Establishment Matched Data
Public wage differentials and the treatment of occupational differences
The Determinants of Queues for Federal Jobs
Inter-Industry Wage Differentials Job Content and Unobserved Ability
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |