Do populists escalate international disputes
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4032860 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sandra Destradi (0000-0001-7509-9349), Johannes Plagemann (0000-0001-9501-5114) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1919-1940 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-09-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiae172 |
| OpenAlex | W4402379671 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
Among the potentially most consequential effects of populism is its impact on countries' international conflict behaviour. However, empirical evidence about populists' approach to international disputes is inconclusive. We develop a theoretical framework focused on mobilization and personalization, which we argue are particularly relevant characteristics of populist foreign policy-making. We hypothesize that, on a conflict-cooperation continuum, a country's approach to a bilateral dispute will become more conflictive under a populist government if that dispute is strongly used for domestic political mobilization, and if decision-making on that issue is highly personalized. Conversely, foreign policy will not become more conflictive in cases of weak mobilization and personalization. We carry out in-depth qualitative within-case comparisons of non-populist and populist governments' policies in Bolivia (2002-2019), India (2004-2022), and the Philippines (2010-2022), focusing on two selected bilateral disputes per country. Drawing on a broad range of sources, including 71 expert interviews conducted in the three countries, we find that populists in power escalate international disputes if they strongly use foreign policy issues for domestic mobilization and, at the same time, strongly personalize decision-making. This finding nuances existing assessments about the effect of populism on foreign policy change
Economics · International trade · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · International Relations in Latin America
Populist Publics’ Affinity for Nuclear Weapons? Explaining Opposition to the Nuclear Sharing Weapons in European Populist Publics
All on the Same Page? Comparing European Populist Radical Right Governments’ Foreign Policy towards China
What kind of vision(s)? The far-right and European security
The Long‐Term Effects of Populism on Foreign Policy
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |