How Large-Scale Research Facilities Connect to Global Research
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4074498 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Giancarlo Lauto (0000-0002-3551-5296, University of Udine), Finn Valentin (0000-0001-7645-8390, Copenhagen Business School) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 381-408 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-07-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ropr.12027 |
| OpenAlex | W2123294764 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 66 |
Policies for large-scale research facilities (LSRFs) often highlight their spillovers to industrial innovation and their contribution to the external connectivity of the regional innovation system hosting them. Arguably, the particular institutional features of LSRFs are conducive for collaborative research. However, based on data on publications produced in 2006-2009 at the Neutron Science Directorate of Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee (United States), we find that internationalization of its collaborative research is restrained by coordination costs similar to those characterizing other institutional settings. Policies mandating LSRFs should consider that research prioritized on the basis of technological relevance limits the international reach of collaborations. Additionally, the propensity for international collaboration is lower for resident scientists than for those affiliated with domestic universities or government laboratories. Policies conceiving LSRFs as "knowledge attractors" therefore should consider the complementarities between research at a LSRF and in its academic context at a regional or national level
Chemistry · Innovation Policy and RD · International Science and Diplomacy · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
International research collaboration
The impact of team compositions on disruptive and novel research in large-scale research infrastructures
Homophily in higher education research
Homophily and its effects on collaborations and repeated collaborations
Co-utilizing global big science facilities
Perceived incentives to transdisciplinarity in a Japanese university research center
Support for International Collaboration in Research
Big science
Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy
Research collaboration at a distance
University spillovers and new firm location
The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes
Scientific teams and institutional collaborations
Scientists’ collaboration strategies
Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations
Toward a new economics of science
What is research collaboration?
The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe
The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research
Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity
Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation
Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science
Research collaboration and productivity
Science as a map in technological search
Pragmatism and self-organization
The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences
Social Resources and Strength of Ties
Academic team formation as evolving hypergraphs
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration
The citation impact of research collaboration in science‐based industries
Clusters and knowledge
Trust, Conflict and Performance in Scientific Collaborations
The Republic of Science
The Republic of science
How Technological Platforms Reconfigure Science-Industry Relations
Priorities in Scientific Discovery
Constructing Regional Advantage
Proximity and Innovation
Social Resources and Strength of Ties
Trends in Multi-Authored Papers in Economics
Evaluating the Improved Research Capacity of EPSCoR States
The Social Capital of Global Ties in Science
Epistemic Cultures
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
| Citações por ano | 0,58 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Altamente citado | Não |