Is hierarchy the only answer? The accountability preferences of Chinese public employees in public service delivery
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4075211 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yanwei Li (0000-0002-6928-2478, Qingdao University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 531-549 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ropr.12531 |
| OpenAlex | W4379162370 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 38 |
This contribution applies the Q methodology to investigate Chinese public employees' accountability preferences under different accountability relationships in delivering public services. We identify four accountability preferences: a vertically oriented accountability, a network-style accountability, a style of accountability between market and participatory accountability, and a vertically oriented style of market accountability. Our data show that Chinese public employees hold varied accountability preferences in public service delivery, and hierarchy is a relatively popular one. It is suggested that governors should effectively align different accountability relationships with the aim of better steering the behavior of public employees in public service delivery
Accountability · Business · Citizen journalism · Hierarchy · Political science · Public relations · Public service · Service delivery framework · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Public Administration · Q Methodology Applications · Marketing
Changes in the accountability obligation, intensity, and working drive of public employees
When line meets agile in public service organizations
Cultural biases, agenda setting, and the regulation of policy processes
Reduced perceived discretion, diminished felt accountability, and ineffective gender representation
Accountability and High‐Effort Coping Strategies of Public Employees
Individual, organizational, and institutional accountability
Accountability under populism and a dramatized environment
Wrestling with multiple accountabilities in times of crisis
Holding Power to Account
Q Methodology
Doing Q Methodological Research
Why People Co-Produce
Qmethod
A validated measurement for felt relational accountability in the public sector
Citizens’ motivations to coproduce
The Limits of Career Concerns in Federalism
Conceptual Bases of Employee Accountability
An accountability account
China’s governance model and system in transition
Participatory Innovations Under Authoritarianism
Coping During Public Service Delivery
Promotion tournament 2.0”
The Rise of Social Accountability in China (社会问责在中国的兴起)
Politics, Administration, and Markets
Accountability through public participation? Experiences from the ten-thousand-citizen review in Nanjing, China
More “Government”, less “Governance”
Further Understanding Accountability in Public Organizations
Four Challenges to Accountability in Contemporary Public Administration
Public Policy and Behavior Change
Pathologies of Accountability
Exploring frontline work in China
Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool
How do professionals perceive the governance of public–private partnerships? Evidence from Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark
Street‐level bureaucrats as policy entrepreneurs
Smog and Air Pollution
Accountability in the Public Sector
Toward a Public Administration Theory of Felt Accountability
Predicting Public Sector Accountability
Serving many masters
The Formation and Impact of Isomorphic Pressures
Rethinking Democratic Accountability
Street-Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability
Accounting for the effects of accountability
Government profiles as perceived by governments' NPO partners in Chinese social service delivery
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |