Evidential holism
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4079558 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Joe Morrison (0000-0002-5551-1743, Queen's University Belfast, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | e12417 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phc3.12417 |
| OpenAlex | W4256047117 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 63 |
Evidential holism begins with something like the claim that "it is only jointly as a theory that scientific statements imply their observable consequences." This is the holistic claim that Elliott Sober tells us is an "unexceptional observation" (1993: 35). But variations on this "unexceptional" claim feature as a premise in a series of controversial arguments for radical conclusions, such as: that there is no analytic or synthetic distinction; that the meaning of a sentence cannot be understood without understanding the whole language of which it is a part; that all knowledge is empirical knowledge (there is no a priori knowledge). This paper is a survey of what evidential holism is, how plausible it is, and what consequences it has. Section 2 will distinguish a range of different holistic claims, Sections 3 and 4 explore how well motivated they are and how they relate to one another, and Section 5 returns to the arguments listed above and uses the distinctions from the previous sections to identify holism's role in each case
A priori and a posteriori · Epistemology · Holism · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Premise · Sentence · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, 1966-1968, Part II (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science)
The Indispensability of Mathematics
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge
The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory
Conjectures and Refutations
On empirically equivalent systems of the world
Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination
Aspects of Scientific Explanation
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Grazer Philosophische Studien
XV—The A Prioricity of Logic
The Incoherence of Empiricism
Three Forms of Naturalism
Are there Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena
A Critique of the Case for Semantic Holism
Uses of Value Judgments in Science
Bayesian Confirmation and Auxiliary Hypotheses Revisited
Good weasel hunting
The holistic presumptions of the indispensability argument
The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity
Just how controversial is evidential holism
Objectivity and the double standard for feminist epistemologies
Inductive Risk and Values in Science
Confirmational Holism and Bayesian Epistemology
Duhem, Quine and Grünbaum on Falsification
Duhem's Problem, the Bayesian Way, and Error Statistics, or “What's Belief Got to Do with It?”
Five Duhemian Theses
Grünbaum on “The Duhemian Argument”
Science and Values
The Duhemian Argument
Content Preservation
Mathematics and Indispensability
Comparative Bayesian Confirmation and the Quine–Duhem Problem
The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses
The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses
The Duhem Thesis
The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy
A Priori Knowledge
Underdetermination, Holism and the Theory/Data Distinction
The case of the female orgasm
Departmental Boundaries within the Corporate Body of Theory
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |