Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Quantifying Burdens of Proof

A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the Classroom

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4085696
AutoresRita James Simon, Linda Mahan
Ano1971
Volume5
Fascículo3
Páginas319-330
Data de publicação1971-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3052837
OpenAlexW2332094122
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas30
Referências citadas1

This paper is the third in a series of articles describing the results of efforts to investigate ways in which the burdens of proof applicable in criminal and civil trials could be defined more precisely and more objectively. The burden of proof for determining guilt in criminal trials in American courts is the presentation of evidence which would lead "a reasonable man" to believe "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the defendant did indeed commit the act for which he was charged. This standard is applicable to all criminal acts irrespective of their heinousness or the circumstances under which they were committed. In civil actions the burden of proof necessary for determining negligence on the part of the defendant is "by preponderance of the evidence

Burden of proof · Civil procedure · Commit · Criminal case · Criminal trial · Criminology · Political science · Presentation (obstetrics · Reasonable Doubt · Computer Science · Criminal Law and Evidence · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Legal processes and jurisprudence · Medicine · Psychology

  • What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process

    Joel D Lieberman, Bruce D Sales•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997

  • Pretrial publicity

    Christina A Studebaker, Steven D Penrod et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997

  • Models of jury decision making

    Steven Penrod, Reid Hastie•Psychological Bulletin•1979

  • Justice needs a new blindfold

    Kathleen C Gerbasi, Kathleen Gerbasi et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1977

  • The ecological validity of jury simulations

    Brian H Bornstein•Law and Human Behavior•1999

  • Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation

    Robert J Maccoun, Norbert L Kerr•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

    Norbert L Kerr, Et Al et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1976

  • On the requirements of proof

    Saul M Kassin, Lawrence S Wrightsman•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Lifting the Veil

    Open Access•Emily Finch, Vanessa E Munro•Journal of Law and Society•2008

  • After Division, Before Decision

    Norbert L Kerr, Barbara L Watts et al.•Social Psychology Quarterly•1982

  • The civil standard of proof—what is it, actually

    Open Access•Mark Schweizer•The International Journal of…•2016

  • The threshold lies in the method

    Open Access•Federico Picinali•The International Journal of…•2015

  • The standard of proof and crime prevention

    Open Access•Ezequiel Malarino•The International Journal of…•2024

  • The beyond a reasonable doubt standard of proof

    Open Access•Olivia K H Smith•The International Journal of…•2022

  • Towards a (Bayesian) Convergence

    Open Access•Richard D Friedman•The International Journal of…•1997

  • A guaranteed right to trial by jury at state level

    Anthony Gray•Australian Journal of Human Rights•2009

  • Methodological issues in legal communication research

    Gerald R Miller, Norman E Fontes et al.•Communication Monographs•1983

  • Does the structure of the evidence base “cause” verdicts of guilty and innocent

    Michael P Ryan, Richard R Hurtig•Discourse Processes•1980

  • Tolerated contests? Plea and sentence in the Victorian magistrates' courts

    Open Access•Roger Douglas•Journal of Criminal Justice•1988

  • Grave doubts about “reasonable doubt”

    Open Access•Craig Hemmens, Kathryn E Scarborough et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•1997

  • Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts

    Norbert L Kerr•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • The American Trial Jury on Trial

    Open Access•Lawrence S Wrightsman•Journal of Social Issues•1978

  • Two Meanings of ‘Reasonableness’

    Open Access•Federico Picinali•Modern Law Review•2013

  • Racializing scripts of deficiency

    Open Access•Jessica López‐espino•Latino Studies•2025

  • Best Evidence

    Open Access•Yonatan Lupu•International Organization•2013

  • Jury decision making

    Dennis J Devine, Laura D Clayton et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001

  • "The conflict between precision and flexibility in explaining "beyond a reasonable doubt

    Elisabeth Stoffelmayr, Shari Seidman Diamond•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • Trial by Jury

    Open Access•John Baldwin, M Mcconville•Law & Society Review•1979

  • Jury Size and Verdict Consistency

    Open Access•Robert T Roper•Law & Society Review•1980

  • Role Playing and the Study of Jury Behavior

    Open Access•Norbert L Kerr, David R Nerenz et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•1979

Obras citantes distintas30
Citações por ano0,6
Intervalo de citações1976 - 2025 (50)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 26
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae