The Development of the Framework for Research Ethics in Terrorism Studies (FRETS)
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4087151 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John Morrison (0000-0003-1548-6392, University of London, autor correspondente), A Silke (0000-0003-4792-1432, Cranfield University), Erin Mcgowan (0000-0003-2591-5840, University of London) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 271-289 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-02-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Terrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09546553.2021.1880196 |
| OpenAlex | W3136954035 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 13 |
| Referências citadas | 13 |
This article introduces readers to the Framework for Research Ethics in Terrorism Studies (FRETS). FRETS has been developed to assist IRB/HREC chairs and reviewers in completing reviews of terrorism studies ethics proposals, in as objective a manner as possible. The framework consists of a series of yes/no questions for chairs and reviewers to answer before completing their reviews. These questions are divided into six different sections: participant’s right’s, safety and vulnerability; informed consent; confidentiality and anonymity; researcher’s right’s, safety and vulnerability; data storage and security-sensitive materials; and the ethical review process. This framework was developed as a result of critical analysis of the literature in terrorism research and analogous fields
Alternative medicine · Anonymity · Computer security · Confidentiality · Engineering ethics · Informed consent · Political science · Research ethics · Terrorism · Computer Science · Disaster Response and Management · Engineering · Ethics in medical practice · Health and Conflict Studies · Law · Medicine
Structural failures of care
Talking ‘about’ the far right as researchers
Extreme Britain
Why we fight
Trauma and the extremist life cycle
Dystopia as ideological technology
Potential violence, trauma and all the feels
Catch 22
Principle versus practice
Psychopathy and crimes against humanity
Challenges for Political Science Research Ethics in Autocracies
We had a lot of fun
Situating Trust, Values, and Ethics in the Politics of Knowledge Production
Ethics of Research in Conflict Environments
Ethical Issues in Research Involving Victims of Terror
The ethics of researching ‘terrorism’ and political violence
Secrecy, coercion and deception in research on ‘terrorism’ and ‘extremism’
Too dangerous for fieldwork? The challenge of institutional risk-management in primary research on conflict, violence and ‘Terrorism’
The human faces of terror
Protecting the Vulnerable
The Ethics of Security Research
Determining the Role of the Internet in Violent Extremism and Terrorism
Scholarly ethics and courtroom antics
Building "Terrorism Studies" as an Interdisciplinary Space
The Golden Age? What the 100 Most Cited Articles in Terrorism Studies Tell Us
Managing Danger in Fieldwork with Perpetrators of Political Violence and State Terror
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3,25 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |