Another look at the degree results of men and women

This paper starts with a critical examination of the claims made in a recent paper by Ernest Rudd (1984) on the relative performance of men and women at degree level, and proceeds to evaluate Rudd's explanation of performance differentials before finally concluding that the most fruitful explanations are likely to be in terms of discriminatory social and institutional pressures. The first part of the paper shows that Rudd overestimates the tendency for men to achieve a disproportionate number of first and third class degrees, and that he fails to pay sufficient attention to the marked differences in performance in different subjects or to the changes in relative performance over time. The second part of the paper reassesses Rudd's explanation of the differences in performance at the first and third class levels, and rejects his suggestion that the differences can be explained by differences in measured intelligence, although some of the difference can be accounted for by differences in A level scores. The third part of the paper looks at the differences in overall performance between men and women in different subjects, concluding that social pressures are the most important factor in determining performance differentials

Demographic economics · Economics · Epistemology · Positive economics · Psychology · School Choice and Performance · Social Psychology

• An Analysis of Degree Results in Geography by Gender

  Keith Chapman•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•1996

  Incluir item

• Gendered” styles of writing and the “inequality in assessment” hypothesis

  Open Access•Sarah Earl‐Novell•International Journal of…•2001

  Incluir item

• An assessment of the extent to which subject variation between the Arts and Sciences in relation to the award of a First Class degree can explain the ‘gender gap’ in UK universities

  Ruth Woodfield, Sarah Earl‐Novell•British Journal of Sociology of…•2006

  Incluir item

• The determinants of undergraduate degree performance

  Open Access•Michael Barrow, Barry Reilly et al.•British Educational Research…•2009

  Incluir item

• Problems of Gender in University Mathematics

  Open Access•Elizabeth Fraser, E J P Fraser•British Educational Research…•1994

  Incluir item

• Gender difference added? Institutional variations in the gender gap in first class degree awards in mathematical sciences

  Open Access•Vanessa Simonite•British Educational Research…•2005

  Incluir item

• Adult Students in Higher Education

  John T E Richardson, Estelle King•The Journal of Higher Education•1998

  Incluir item

• Individual and gender differences in good and first-class undergraduate degree performance

  Open Access•Tom Farsides, Ruth Woodfield•British Journal of Psychology•2007

  Incluir item

• Another Look at the Role of Age, Gender and Subject as Predictors of Academic Attainment in Higher Education

  John T E Richardson, Alan Woodley•Studies in Higher Education•2003

  Incluir item

• Gender differences in undergraduate attendance rates

  Ruth Woodfield, Donna Jessop et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2006

  Incluir item

• A reply to Bradley

  Ernest Rudd•Studies in Higher Education•1985

  Incluir item

• A comparison between the results achieved by women and men studying for first degrees in British universities

  Ernest Rudd•Studies in Higher Education•1984

  Incluir item

• Sex bias in examining reconsidered

  Clare Bradley•Studies in Higher Education•1985

  Incluir item