Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Environmental rights and the US system of protection

Why the US Environmental Protection Agency is not a rights-based administrative agency

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4138871
AutoresM B Mackay (Monash University, autor correspondente), Michael Mackay (0000-0003-3948-8130, Monash University, autor correspondente)
Ano1994
Volume26
Fascículo11
Páginas1761-1785
Data de publicação1994-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEnvironment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0308518x9402601105
OpenAlexW2032900981
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas20

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been the subject of much controversy during the twenty or so years since its establishment-much more controversy than other agencies created at around the same time. Descriptions of the EPA's failures often focus upon the inherent faults in its structure and on the statutes it was asked to administer. One point almost completely ignored is the fact that, unlike other agencies of the 'rights revolution', the EPA has been asked to protect an entity not yet truly recognized as a right. Although the EPA was a product of the 'rights revolution', it was not a rights-based agency, and was probably never intended to be so. This helps to explain why it has failed to meet its statutory mandates-all three branches of government have been able to minimize the effects of environmental regulation without ever having to consider fully the environmental rights of the citizenry. The National Environmental Policy Act provided the citizenry with the assurance that environmental interests would be considered within the governmental and bureaucratic decisionmaking process, but this was no guarantee of rights. In this paper it is suggested that without any recognition of true environmental rights it will always be possible for pro-development interests to reduce the obligations and effects of environmental protection legislation upon industry

Bureaucracy · Business · Economics · Environmental law · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Environmentalism · Fundamental rights · Geography · Human rights · Law and economics · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Right to property · Rights of Nature · Sociology · Statute · Statutory law · Corporate Law and Human Rights · Environmental law and policy · International Environmental Law and Policies · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Public Administration · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Environmental Rights

    Christopher E Miller, Christopher Miller•Journal of Law and Society•1995

  • The hare and the tortoise

    Lennart Lundqvist•The hare and the tortoise•1980

  • Vermont Yankee

    Antonin Scalia•The Supreme Court Review•1978

  • Funding for environmental protection

    Open Access•James L Regens•The Social Science Journal•1989

  • Environmental Policy under Reagan's Executive Order

    Open Access•E Donald Elliott, V Kerry Smith•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1985

  • Dismantling America

    Open Access•Peter H Schuck, Susan J Tolchin et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1984

  • Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective

    Robert L Rabin•Stanford Law Review•1986

  • Promise and Performance. Choosing and Implementing an Environmental Policy

    John Opie, Alfred A Marcus•Journal of American History•1981

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,03
Intervalo de citações1995 - 1995 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae