Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How perceived coercion polarizes unvaccinated people

The mediating role of conspiracy beliefs

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4228010
AutoresHaiyan Wang (0000-0003-2534-6756, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Jan-Willem Van Prooijen (0000-0001-6236-0819, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Paul A M Van Lange (0000-0001-7774-6984), Paul Am Van Lange (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Ano2025
Volume30
Fascículo9
Páginas2354-2367
Data de publicação2025-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Health Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1359-1053 • E-ISSN: 1461-7277
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/13591053241238126
PMID38494647
OpenAlexW4392922143
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas57

During the COVID-19 pandemic, different policies were implemented to increase vaccination uptake. Meanwhile, conspiracy theories spread widely, and vaccinated versus unvaccinated people increasingly polarized against each other. This study examined the associations between perceived vaccination coercion, conspiracy beliefs and polarization. We tested the relationship of vaccination status with perceived vaccination coercion, conspiracy beliefs, and polarization, with a total sample size of N = 1202 ( n = 400 in China, n = 401 in the US, and n = 401 in the UK), among them n = 603 were vaccinated and n = 599 were unvaccinated. As pre-registered, unvaccinated people perceived more vaccination coercion and endorsed more conspiracy theories. Conspiracy mentality was positively related to perceived coercion. Contrary to our hypotheses, vaccinated people were more polarized toward unvaccinated people than vice versa. Finally, conspiracy beliefs mediated the link between perceived coercion and polarization among unvaccinated people

Coercion (linguistics · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Infectious disease (medical specialty · Pandemic · Perception · Polarization (electrochemistry · Risk perception · Vaccination · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Immunology · Social Psychology

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•1957

  • Misinformation

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden•Nature Medicine•2022

  • Predictors of intention to vaccinate against Covid-19

    Open Access•Jeanette B Ruiz, Robert A Bell•Vaccine•2021

  • Tearing apart the “evil” twins

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Tisa Bertlich et al.•Current Opinion in Psychology•2022

  • Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook

    Open Access•Ana Lucía Schmidt, Fabiana Zollo et al.•Vaccine•2018

  • Echo Chambers

    Open Access•Michela Del Vicario, Gianna Vivaldo et al.•Scientific Reports•2016

  • Belief in Covid‐19 Conspiracy Theories Reduces Social Distancing over Time

    Open Access•Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Jonas R Kunst et al.•Applied Psychology: Health and…•2020

  • Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts

    Open Access•John T Jost, Delia Baldassarri et al.•Nature Reviews Psychology•2022

  • A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage

    Open Access•Jeremy B Bernerth, Herman Aguinis•Personnel Psychology•2016

  • The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Elliot Aronson•ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL…•1969

  • A global survey of potential acceptance of a Covid-19 vaccine

    Open Access•Jeffrey V Lazarus, Scott C Ratzan et al.•Nature Medicine•2021

  • Optimism-pessimism, conspiracy theories and general trust as factors contributing to Covid-19 related behavior – A cross-cultural study

    Open Access•Ana Jovančević, Nebojša Milićević•Personality and Individual…•2020

  • Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science

    Open Access•Daniël Lakens•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures

    Open Access•Michele J Gelfand, Jana L Raver et al.•Science•2011

  • What Drives Belief in Vaccination Conspiracy Theories in Germany

    Open Access•Eric A Jensen, Axel Pfleger et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • The unintended consequences of Covid-19 vaccine policy

    Open Access•Kevin Bardosh, Alex de Figueiredo et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • Examining a domain-specific link between perceived control and conspiracy beliefs

    Open Access•Ana Stojanov, Jamin Halberstadt et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • United but divided

    Open Access•Iryna Sabat, Sebastian Neumann‐Böhme et al.•Health Policy•2020

  • Do Conspiracy Theories Shape or Rationalize Vaccination Hesitancy Over Time

    Open Access•Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, Nienke Böhm•Social Psychological and…•2024

  • The Psychology of Political Polarization

    Jan-Willem Van Prooijen•Psychology of Political…•2021

  • The Influence of Control on Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, Michele Acker•Applied Cognitive Psychology•2015

  • A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Pia Lamberty•Social Psychological and…•2020

  • Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures

    Open Access•Martin Bruder, Peter Haffke et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Why moral advocacy leads to polarization and proselytization

    Open Access•Ravini S Abeywickrama, Joshua J Rhee et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2020

  • Does lack of control lead to conspiracy beliefs? A meta‐analysis

    Open Access•Ana Stojanov, Jamin Halberstadt•European Journal of Social…•2020

  • Using social and behavioural science to support Covid-19 pandemic response

    Open Access•Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Katherine Baicker et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

  • Informational Cues, Partisan-Motivated Reasoning, and the Manipulation of Conspiracy Beliefs

    A M Enders, Steven M Smallpage•Political Communication•2019

  • What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy

    Miroslaw Kofta, Wiktor Soral et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2020

  • Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning

    Open Access•Joanne M Miller, Kyle L Saunders et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • The association between vaccination status identification and societal polarization

    Open Access•L Henkel, Philipp Sprengholz et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Public support for unequal treatment of unvaccinated citizens

    Open Access•Julian Schuessler, P T Dinesen et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of Covid-19 in the U.S

    Open Access•Daniel Romer, Kathleen Hall Jamieson•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Health Policy Perception and Health Behaviours

    Open Access•Thomas Von Lengerke, Jan Vinck et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2004

  • The mediating role of vaccine hesitancy in the relations of Covid-19 conspiracy beliefs and vaccination outcomes

    Open Access•M C Howard, Maggie M Davis•Journal of Health Psychology•2023

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae