Elephants, safety nets and agrarian culture
Understanding human-wildlife conflict and rural livelihoods around Chobe National Park, Botswana
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4302308 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ankita Gupta (0000-0002-7751-067X, Yale University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 238 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-12-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Political Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1073-0451 • E-ISSN: 1073-0451 |
| Editora | University of Arizona (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2458/v20i1.21766 |
| OpenAlex | W2777721814 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 13 |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
Resolving conflict between agricultural livelihoods and wildlife conservation requires a sophisticated understanding of both wildlife ecology and human livelihood decision-making. This case study extends the literature on human-wildlife conflict in Africa by using a political ecology framework to understand how and why farmers in areas of high wildlife disturbance make their farming decisions, and how their strategies are affected by a broader socio-political context that includes, but is not restricted to, wildlife conservation policy. Specifically, this article chronicles the livelihood strategies of smallholder farmers in a village on the edge of Chobe National Park in northern Botswana. This is a place where the state has prioritized wildlife conservation but also supports residents' livelihoods. Because of disturbance from wildlife, especially elephants, protected under conservation law, agricultural production in Chobe is becoming increasingly challenging, even as the government increases its agricultural subsidies and support to small farmers. This results in unexpected farming strategies that reflect the interactive effects of conservation policy and other relevant macro-economic policies that structure the livelihood strategies of rural communities living near protected areas. Future human-wildlife conflict studies must take into account these multi-scalar and multi-dimensional dynamics in order to accurately explain the livelihood strategies of people living in wildlife-populated areas, so that appropriate conservation and development policies can be designed
Human–wildlife conflict · Political ecology · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Assessing long-term conservation impacts on adaptive capacity in a flagship community-based natural resources management area in Botswana
Understanding farmers' reasons behind mitigation decisions is key in supporting their coexistence with wildlife
The political ecology of human-elephant relations
Elephants over the Cliff
Human conflict over wildlife
Working With and For Animals—A Response to Nussbaum
Environmental justice and the post-Covid-19 regulation of wildlife trade and markets
Human–Wildlife Interactions and Environmental Dynamics in the Okavango Delta, Botswana
Wildlife officials only care about animals’
Conservation and development 2.0
Political ecologies of livestock predation
Conditions of Conflict
Unpacking Natural Resource Reliance and Poverty in Northern Botswana
Silent violence
Parks and Peoples
Imposing Wilderness
Conservation Refugees
Temporal patterns of crop‐raiding by primates
Land Degradation and Society
Married Life in an African Tribe
Human–Elephant Conflict Around Bénoué National Park, Cameroon
Elephants in the garden
Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment
Capitals and Capabilities
African rural labour, income diversification & livelihood approaches
African Wildlife and Livelihoods
Urban-rural linkages as an urban survival strategy among urban dwellers in Botswana
Conservation-related Resettlement in Central Africa
| Citações por ano | 1,18 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Altamente citado | Não |