Challenging Masculinism

This article begins by discussing ‘masculinism’ in the field of history in terms of gender blindness. It then looks at a more particular usage of the term, as a resort to the ridiculing and demeaning of women historical actors, not least in some influential treatments of the twentieth-century campaigns in Britain for women's suffrage. It argues that masculinist history rests upon the use of stereotypes of women that, when they do not mock, either marginalise or altogether refuse them a place in the larger narratives of community, state and nation. It then looks at the adoption of various forms of ‘personal history’ in much of the ‘new women's history’, including feminist histories of the women's suffrage movement, forms which generally rely on private papers: letters, diaries, memoirs and other life-writing. Finally, it looks at the practice of ‘microhistory’ and suggests that the value of such forms and methods lies especially in their capacity to challenge the stereotypes on which masculinism rests, through a focus on the particular that aids recognition of the varieties and differences to be found among women within their shared subordination as a sex

Art · Feminism · Feminist movement · Literature · Microhistory · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Suffrage · Women's history · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law

• Annual Bibliography, 2011

  Yasmin Adeeb, Fathi Boud•Labour History Review•2012

  Incluir item

• Looking More Like Ghosts Than Women

  Open Access•Harold Sims, Harriette Richards•Australian Feminist Studies•2025

  Incluir item

• If They Cannot Take It Straight, They Will Get It in Fiction

  Tamar Hager•Poetics Today•2019

  Incluir item

• The General Messiness of Life

  Tamar Hager•Poetics Today•2018

  Incluir item