On a Sufficient Condition for Hyperintensionality
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4352133 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Vera Hoffmann-Kol, Vera Hoffmann-Kolss (0000-0001-5324-0559, University of Cologne, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Fascículo | 260 |
| Páginas | 336-354 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqv021 |
| OpenAlex | W2326288061 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 33 |
Let an X/Y distinction be a distinction between kinds of properties, such as the distinctions between qualitative and non-qualitative, intrinsic and extrinsic, perfectly natural and less-than-perfectly natural or dispositional and categorical properties. An X/Y distinction is hyperintensional iff there are cointensional properties P and Q, such that P is an X-property, whereas Q is a Y-property. Many accounts of metaphysical distinctions among properties presuppose that such distinctions are non-hyperintensional. In this paper, I call this presupposition into question. I develop a sufficient condition for the hyperintensionality of X/Y distinctions and argue that this condition is satisfied by a number of standard classifications of properties. It follows that non-hyperintensional analyses of distinctions among properties are harder to defend than is often assumed.
Aesthetics · Categorical variable · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Natural (archaeology) · Natural kind · Presupposition · Property (philosophy) · Pure mathematics · Statistics · Classical Philosophy and Thought · History · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
From an Ontological Point of View
Metaphysical Dependence
Naming and Necessity
On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals
On What Grounds What
Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?
XIV—Ontological Dependence
Essence and Modality
On the Need for Properties
Special sciences (or
Intrinsic/extrinsic
Actualism and thisness
Defining 'Intrinsic
Intrinsicality and Hyperintensionality
Intrinsicality without Naturalness
Can ‘Intrinsic’ Be Defined Using Only Broadly Logical Notions? 1
Langton and Lewis on “Intrinsic”
Intrinsicality and Grounding
Finkish Dispositions
Realism, Functionalism and the Conditional Analysis of Dispositions
Substance and Attribute
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |