Pitfalls of Emancipation and Discourses of Security

Reflections on Canada's 'Security with a Human Face

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4444952
AutoresMark Neufeld (Trent University, Ontario, Canada, autor correspondente)
Ano2004
Volume18
Fascículo1
Páginas109-123
Data de publicação2004-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Relations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0047-1178 • E-ISSN: 1741-2862
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0047117804041744
OpenAlexW2025835459
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas9
Referências citadas9

The call to develop self-consciously critical approaches to security stands as one of the more hopeful intellectual developments in recent years. It is argued that a critical - and hence, emancipatory - strategy is one which focuses on the more 'empirical' question of how security issues are framed in political discourse. Here the emphasis is on exploring how different conceptions of security - both traditional and expanded - find their way into public debates; how specific values are made socially concrete in this process, and how people both act and are acted upon in the process of history unfolding. The merits of this approach are illustrated by examining a concrete case: the evolution of security discourse in Canada in the latter half of the 20th century, and the function of that discourse in terms of changing forms of state and world order

Cloud computing security · Critical security studies · Economics · Emancipation · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept) · Function (biology) · Human security · Network security policy · Order (exchange) · Political science · Politics · Public discourse · Security studies · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science) · Computer Science · Global Security and Public Health · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security