Doubly disadvantaged
On the recruitment of diverse subjects for clinical trials in Latin America
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4448121 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Manuela Fernández-Pinto (0000-0002-2318-1284, Universidad de los Andes, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 391-407 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2572-9861 • E-ISSN: 2572-9861 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/25729861.2018.1556237 |
| OpenAlex | W2946341339 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 59 |
Due to its allegedly diverse population and strong doctor–patient relations, Latin America has become one of the most attractive locations for international clinical trials. In the paper, I examine the case of recruitment of women and minority patients to serve as subjects of international clinical trials, through CROs operating in Latin America. In particular, the paper examines some of the strategies that CROs use to expand their services in the Latin American medical market, illuminating the mechanisms through which the current organization of medical research contributes to power imbalances in the Global South. After analyzing the epistemic and ethical shortcomings of such endeavor, I show how Latin American patients participating in clinical trials are located in a position of double disadvantage. First, they suffer the consequences of a lack of appropriate understanding of symptoms and reaction to treatment. Second, they suffer the consequences of being subjects in clinical trials which are not designed to meet their needs, but the needs of patients in the Global North. Accordingly, I conclude by highlighting the importance of this double disadvantage and suggesting that the problem can be understood in terms of a misalignment of commercial, ethical, and epistemic concerns in clinical research
Alternative medicine · Business · Clinical trial · Disadvantage · Disadvantaged · Environmental health · Latin Americans · Pathology · Political science · Population · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Ethics in Clinical Research · Global Health and Surgery · Law · Medicine · Psychology
The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice
Pharmocracy
Inclusion
Is a Little Pollution Good for You?
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal
Science-Mart
Título indisponível
Wanted Single, White Male for Medical Research
Social Empiricism
The Fight Against Doubt
Philosophy of Science after Feminism
Objectivity and Diversity
When Experiments Travel
Ethnic Minority Older Adults Participating in Clinical Research
The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research
The Rise of `Recruitmentology
Coupled Ethical–Epistemic Analysis of Public Health Research and Practice
Embedding philosophers in the practices of science
A new direction for science and values
Democratizing Strategies for Industry-Funded Medical Research
Research on the Provider Contribution to Race/Ethnicity Disparities in Medical Care
Ethical variability
Under the shadow of Tuskegee
The Construction of Lay Expertise
Pharmaceuticalization
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |