Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Doubly disadvantaged

On the recruitment of diverse subjects for clinical trials in Latin America

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4448121
AutoresManuela Fernández-Pinto (0000-0002-2318-1284, Universidad de los Andes, autor correspondente)
Ano2019
Volume2
Fascículo1
Páginas391-407
Data de publicação2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoTapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2572-9861 • E-ISSN: 2572-9861
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/25729861.2018.1556237
OpenAlexW2946341339
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas59

Due to its allegedly diverse population and strong doctor–patient relations, Latin America has become one of the most attractive locations for international clinical trials. In the paper, I examine the case of recruitment of women and minority patients to serve as subjects of international clinical trials, through CROs operating in Latin America. In particular, the paper examines some of the strategies that CROs use to expand their services in the Latin American medical market, illuminating the mechanisms through which the current organization of medical research contributes to power imbalances in the Global South. After analyzing the epistemic and ethical shortcomings of such endeavor, I show how Latin American patients participating in clinical trials are located in a position of double disadvantage. First, they suffer the consequences of a lack of appropriate understanding of symptoms and reaction to treatment. Second, they suffer the consequences of being subjects in clinical trials which are not designed to meet their needs, but the needs of patients in the Global North. Accordingly, I conclude by highlighting the importance of this double disadvantage and suggesting that the problem can be understood in terms of a misalignment of commercial, ethical, and epistemic concerns in clinical research

Alternative medicine · Business · Clinical trial · Disadvantage · Disadvantaged · Environmental health · Latin Americans · Pathology · Political science · Population · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Ethics in Clinical Research · Global Health and Surgery · Law · Medicine · Psychology

  • Pragmatic Progress and the Improvement of Medical Knowledge for Global Health

    Open Access•Manuela Fernández-Pinto•Science & Technology Studies•2024

  • Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influence 2023

    James Evans, Tyler Reigeluth et al.•Isis•2023

  • Commercial Interests and the Erosion of Trust in Science

    Open Access•Manuela Fernández-Pinto, Manuela Fernández Pinto•Philosophy of Science•2020

  • The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice

    Martin Carrier, Don Howard et al.•Challenge of the Social and the…•2008

  • Pharmocracy

    Open Access•Kaushik Sunder Rajan•Pharmocracy•2017

  • Inclusion

    Steven Epstein•Inclusion•2007

  • Is a Little Pollution Good for You?

    Kevin C Elliott, Kevin Elliott•Is a little pollution good for you?•2011

  • Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

    Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Science, Policy, and the…•2009

  • Science-Mart

    Philip Mirowski•Science-Mart•2011

  • Título indisponível

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Wanted Single, White Male for Medical Research

    Rebecca Dresser•The Hastings Center Report•1992

  • Social Empiricism

    Miriam Solomon•Social empiricism•2001

  • The Fight Against Doubt

    Inmaculada De Melo-Martín, Kristen Intemann•The Fight Against Doubt•2018

  • Philosophy of Science after Feminism

    Janet A Kourany•Philosophy of science after…•2010

  • Objectivity and Diversity

    Sandra Harding•Objectivity and Diversity•2015

  • When Experiments Travel

    Adriana Petryna•When Experiments Travel•2009

  • Ethnic Minority Older Adults Participating in Clinical Research

    Open Access•Gina Moreno-John, Anthony Gachie et al.•Journal of Aging and Health•2004

  • The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research

    Open Access•Philip Mirowski, Robert Van Horn•Social Studies of Science•2005

  • The Rise of `Recruitmentology

    Open Access•Steven Epstein•Social Studies of Science•2008

  • Coupled Ethical–Epistemic Analysis of Public Health Research and Practice

    Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Sean A Valle et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

  • Embedding philosophers in the practices of science

    Open Access•Nancy Tuana•Synthese•2013

  • A new direction for science and values

    Open Access•Daniel J Hicks•Synthese•2014

  • Democratizing Strategies for Industry-Funded Medical Research

    Open Access•Manuela Fernández-Pinto•Philosophy of Science•2018

  • Research on the Provider Contribution to Race/Ethnicity Disparities in Medical Care

    Michelle Van Ryn•Medical Care•2002

  • Ethical variability

    Open Access•A Petryna•American Ethnologist•2005

  • Under the shadow of Tuskegee

    Vanessa Northington Gamble•American Journal of Public Health•1997

  • The Construction of Lay Expertise

    Open Access•Steven Epstein•Science Technology & Human Values•1995

  • Pharmaceuticalization

    João B Biehl, João Guilherme Biehl•Anthropological Quarterly•2007

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,5
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2024 (5)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae