Why nationalism did not emerge earlier in Timor-Leste

This article explores Timor-Leste’s long history of colonial encounters with modernity and globalisation. Over a couple of centuries these forces contributed to creating a particular form of customary nationhood that differed from other nations which, on the face it, appear to have parallel histories. More than that, a sense of nationhood came later in Timor-Leste than in most colonial and postcolonial settings. Through an analysis of Timor’s predominantly customary forms of sociality and organisation, this article explores why political nationalism came so late to a territory that like many other colonies had an established generalising cultural identity and was part of a global history of colonisation. Drawing in issues such as Timor’s place in global history, conflict, resistance, Indigenous power, the unevenness of Portuguese colonisation, rejection of the homogenising process and the naming of the Timorese people, it is concluded that the continuing depth of customary-traditional cultures and the nature of the colonial experience cut against the early formation of a sense of nationhood, even as this became one of the strengths in the Timorese fight against colonial oppression

Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Colonialism · Colonisation · Ethnology · Hybridity · Indigenous · Modernity · Nationalism · Political science · Politics · Portuguese · Sociology · Anthropology · Cyprus History, Politics, Society · Gender Studies · History · Island Studies and Pacific Affairs · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security

• Death, emplaced security and space in contemporary Timor-Leste

  Open Access•Damian Grenfell•Cooperation and Conflict•2020

  Incluir item

• Una visión panorámica de los estudios antropológicos sobre Timor-Leste desde 2002

  Open Access•Alberto Fidalgo-Castro•Estudios de Asia y África•2022

  Incluir item