Greimas embodied

How kinesthetic opposition grounds the semiotic square

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4475003
AutoresJamin Pelkey (0000-0002-0069-0617, Toronto Metropolitan University, autor correspondente)
Ano2017
Volume2017
Fascículo214
Data de publicação2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSemiotica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692
EditoraWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/sem-2016-0188
OpenAlexW2562972267
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas12

According to Greimas, the semiotic square is far more than a heuristic for semantic and literary analysis. It represents the generative "deep structure" of human culture and cognition which "define the fundamental mode of existence of an individual or of a society, and subsequently the conditions of existence of semiotic objects". The veracity of this bold hypothesis has received little attention in the literature. In response, this paper traces the history and development of the square of opposition from Aristotle to Greimas and beyond, to propose that the relations modeled in these diagrams are rooted in gestalt memories of kinesthesia and proprioception from which we derive basic structural awareness of opposition and contrast-including verticality, bilaterality, transversality, markedness and analogy. The paper draws on findings in the phenomenology of movement, recent developments in the analysis of logical opposition, recent scholarship in (post)Greimasian semiotics and prescient insights from Greimas himself. The argument is further tested via multimodal content analyses of a popular music video-highlighting relationships the semiotic square shares with mundane cultural ideologies and showing how these relationships might be traced to memory structures of bodily movement. The paper highlights the neglected relevance of embodied chiasmus and illustrates the enduring relevance of Greimasean thought

Aesthetics · Analogy · Binary opposition · Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Iconicity · Linguistics · Opposition (politics) · Phenomenology (philosophy) · Politics · Semiotics · Sociology · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Semiotics and Representation Studies