How the Old Left Has Found a New Place in the Memory Game
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4495955 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Patrick H Hutton (0009-0006-5768-8725, University of Vermont, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2011 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 98-111 |
| Data de publicação | 2011-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | History and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00569.x |
| OpenAlex | W2004605927 |
| Idioma | EN |
In his new book, How Modernity Forgets, Paul Connerton seeks to show a relationship between the workings of late capitalism and the institutionalization of forgetfulness in ever more abstract conceptions of space and time. He uses this argument to explain why the topic of collective memory has waxed so large in contemporary historical scholarship. I interpret his argument in light of his earlier work on habit memory and his still earlier critique of Frankfurt School social theory. I close with some comments on his study in the context of recent work on mnemonic practices in modern culture
Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Capitalism · Collective memory · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Institutionalisation · Linguistics · Mnemonic · Modernity · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Philosophy · Social and Cultural Dynamics
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |