Shifting Expert Configurations and the Public Credibility of Science

ArgumentIn the Netherlands, a country of water, dikes, and dams, the role of civil engineering in policy making and public debates over flood safety have changed over the last four decades. This had not just implied that new directions in flood safety policy were considered by politics, but also that engineering experts traditionally working in this area found their credibility challenged by competing expertises. I will argue that in responding to those challenges, experts combined boundary work (upholding boundaries between science and non-science, or between different fields of expertise) with identity work, in which the planning of actions and learning from experience are informed by the identity of oneself as an expert. The views of experts on the boundary zone of science, policy, and public debate, and the role and skills one attributes to oneself, are regarded as important aspects of that identity work. On the basis of biographical-narrative research, this will show that although the four experts studied here belong to a specific generation of engineers, experiencing common challenges and developments in their field of work, the combination of identity work and boundary work results in specific roles and responses for each individual expert

Aesthetics · Boundary-work · Credibility · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Flood myth · Geography · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Social Science and Policy Research · Mechanical Engineering

• Dissident Dietary Credibility

  Open Access•Melanie Leenen, Bart Penders•Science Communication•2016

  Incluir item

• Cultural Boundaries of Science

  Thomas F Gieryn•Cultural Boundaries of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• The System of Professions

  Andrew Abbott•System of Professions•1988

  Incluir item

• Rethinking Expertise

  Harry Collins, Robert Evans•Rethinking Expertise•2007

  Incluir item

• Symbolic Interactionism

  Herbert Blumer•Symbolic Interactionism•1986

  Incluir item

• Agendas, alternatives, and public policies

  John W Kingdon•Agendas, alternatives, and public…•1995

  Incluir item

• Handbook of Science and Technology Studies

  Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E Markle et al.•Handbook of Science and…•1995

  Incluir item

• Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists

  Arie Rip•Science as Culture•2006

  Incluir item

• Flood safety in the Netherlands

  Open Access•Anna Wesselink, Anna J Wesselink•Technology in Society•2007

  Incluir item

• Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research

  Open Access•Art Dewulf, Barbara Gray et al.•Human Relations•2009

  Incluir item

• Misunderstood misunderstanding

  Open Access•Brian Wynne•Public Understanding of Science•1992

  Incluir item

• Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

  Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  Incluir item

• "Remaking "Nature

  Open Access•Cornelis Disco•Science Technology & Human Values•2002

  Incluir item

• Credibility Engineering in the Food Industry

  Open Access•Bart Penders, Annemiek P Nelis et al.•Science in Context•2011

  Incluir item

• Working at the science-policy interface

  Dave Huitema, Esther Turnhout•Environmental Politics•2009

  Incluir item

• After Disaster

  Open Access•F R Baumgartner•Political Science Quarterly•1998

  Incluir item

• The Oosterschelde Storm Surge Barrier

  Wiebe E Bijker•Technology and Culture•2002

  Incluir item

• Learning from the Dutch

  Martin Reu, Martin Reuss•Technology and Culture•2002

  Incluir item