What Counts for Identity? The Historical Origins of the Methodology of Latent Fingerprint Identification

The ArgumentTwo parallel traditions have coexisted throughout the history of modern finger print identification. One, which gave more emphasis to the rhetoric of "science," has always been somewhat troubled by the lack of an easily articulated scientific foundation for "dactyloscopy." The other, more concerned with practicalities, was satisfied that the method of fingerprint identification appeared to "work" and that it won widespread legal acceptance. The latter group established conser vative rules of practice to guard against errors and preserve the credibility of latent fingerprint identification in the eyes of the law. The legacy of this history is coming home to roost today, as some latent fingerprint examiners (LFPEs) are beginning to argue that the traditional practice of latent fingerprint comparison lacks a scientific foundation appropriate to contemporary forensic science. This issue raises the question of what constitutes a "scientific" method for individual ized identification in a legal setting

Aesthetics · Biology · Credibility · Epistemology · Linguistics · Political science · Rhetoric · Sociology · Computer Science · Digital and Traditional Archives Management · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Research, Science, and Academia · Twentieth Century Scientific Developments · Artificial Intelligence · Ecology

• The Emergence of the Silent Witness

  Open Access•Tal Golan•Social Studies of Science•2004

  Incluir item

• First impressions matter

  Open Access•Shelley A Cole, Justin Lucas Sola•Social Studies of Science•2025

  Incluir item

• How Deep is the Skin? The Geneticization of Race and Medicine

  Open Access•Gísli Pálsson•BioSocieties•2007

  Incluir item

• Sex, Ancestral, and pattern type variation of fingerprint minutiae

  Open Access•Nichole A Fournier, Ann H Ro et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2016

  Incluir item

• Construing "Technology" as "Applied Science"

  Ronald R Kline•Isis•1995

  Incluir item

• Collecting, Testing and Convincing

  Open Access•Halfon•Social Studies of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• Contested Identities

  Open Access•Michael Lynch, Michael S Lynch et al.•Social Studies of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• The Discursive Production of Uncertainty

  Open Access•Michael Lynch, Michael S Lynch•Social Studies of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• The Dissemination, Standardization and Routinization of a Molecular Biological Technique

  Open Access•Kathleen Jordan, Michael Lynch et al.•Social Studies of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• Witnessing Identification

  Open Access•Shelley A Cole•Social Studies of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• The Eye of Everyman

  Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Social Studies of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• The Evidence Does Not Speak for Itself

  Open Access•Arthur Daemmrich•Social Studies of Science•1998

  Incluir item

• Science at the Bar

  Arthur L Stinchcombe, Sheila Jasanoff•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1996

  Incluir item

• The Royal Canadian Mounted Police

  Open Access•V A M Kemp, Vicky Kemp•Polar Record•1934

  Incluir item

• Signaletic Instructions, Including the Theory and Practice of Anthropometrical Identification

  Open Access•A T, Alphonse Bertillon et al.•The Journal of the Anthropological…•1897

  Incluir item

• Personal Identification and Description

  Francis Galton•The Journal of the Anthropological…•1889

  Incluir item

• A Social History of Truth

  Steven Shapin•A Social History of Truth•1994

  Incluir item

• Science at the Bar

  Sheila Jasanoff•Science at the Bar•1995

  Incluir item

• In the Backrooms of Science

  Open Access•Stephen R Barley, Beth A Bechky•Work and Occupations•1994

  Incluir item