History, Philosophy, and the Central Metaphor
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4516620 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Peter Galison (0000-0002-6429-3872, Stanford University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1988 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 197-212 |
| Data de publicação | 1988-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Science in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0269889700000557 |
| OpenAlex | W2149340629 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 32 |
| Referências citadas | 11 |
The ArgumentBehind the dispute over the relative priority of theory and experiment lie conflicting philosophical images of the nature of scientific inquiry. One crucial image arose in the 1920s, when the logical positivists agitated for a "unity of science" that would ground all meaningful scientific activity on an observational foundation. Their goals and rhetoric dovetailed with the larger movements of architectural, literary, and philosophical modernism. Historians of science followed the positivists by tracking experimental science as the basis for scientific progress. After World War II, historians and philosophers of science created an antipositivist movement, inverting the positivist idea that observation had epistemic (and historical) priority. But this counter-movement retained the modernist aspiration to unity, now chaining observation to theory. Once again historians of science, following their philosophical colleagues, illustrated the new modernism with historical instances of observation dominated by theory.Either reductionist scheme, by privileging one activity over the other, dictates an overly constrictive periodization. We need a wider class of periodization models ("central metaphors") that will allow instrumentation, experimentation, and theory a partial autonomy without granting any one the sole legitimate narrative standpoint. Such a heterogeneous representation of historical traditions may, surprisingly, make better sense of the perceived coherence of activity across theoretical transitions than the monolithic modernist representation of science it displaces
Epistemology · Metaphor · Positivism · Rhetoric · Sociology · Chemistry · History of Science and Natural History · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Science and Climate Studies
Ernst Mach and the Fortunes of Positivism in America
Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences
Fallibilism versus Relativism in the Philosophy of Science
How research programs come apart
The roles of integration in molecular systems biology
Human Nature is a Garden
Whose Mass is it Anyway? Particle Cosmology and the Objects of Theory
Remaking Muslim Politics
The quantum counter-revolution
Lumping, testing, tuning
Neurath's Protocol Statements
Fuller and Rouse on the Legitimation of Scientific Knowledge
Philosophy of science and the persistent narratives of modernity
Making a machine instrumental
The discovery of the Zeeman effect
Experiment, difference, and writing
On scientific instruments
Fallibilism, naturalism and the traditional requirements for knowledge
Layered history
Interweaving categories
Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods
The Interplay of Instrumentation, Experiment, and Theory
The Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science
Aurora, Nemesis and Clio
In Defense of Logical Sloth
Cleaning a dark matter detector
The Layers of Chemical Language, II
From the Science of Accounts to the Financial Accountability of Science
Astronomers Mark Time
Has Economics Progressed? Rectilinear, Historicist, Universalist, and Evolutionary Historiographies
The Flow of Cognitive Goods
An introduction to cultural and social studies of sciences and technologies
Sciences and Cultures
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
From a Logical Point of View
How Experiments End
Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Unified Science as Encyclopedic Integration
Representing and Intervening
Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought
An intellectual autobiography
| Obras citantes distintas | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,84 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1988 - 2026 (39) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 31 |