Making sense of noncitizens' rights claims in asylum appeal hearings
Practices and sentiments of procedural justice among German administrative judges
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4524967 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Larissa Vetters (0000-0002-3408-4850, Law & Anthropology, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle (Saale), Germany, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Fascículo | 7 |
| Páginas | 927-943 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-10-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Citizenship Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1362-1025 • E-ISSN: 1469-3593 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13621025.2022.2137940 |
| OpenAlex | W4307444652 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 37 |
Ethnographically exploring how German judges in administrative courts of first instance navigate the practical, political, legal and ethical dilemmas of deciding on asylum appeals, this article identifies the oral hearing in asylum adjudication as a site of citizenship struggles in which rights claims by noncitizens undergo subtle transformations through the manner in which procedural rules are interpreted and enacted. Building on observations of asylum appeal hearings, conversations and focus group discussions with judges, I show that practices and sentiments of procedural justice among asylum appeal judges are at the core of these transformations. Hence, I argue for renewed analytical and conceptual attention to citizenship struggles that take place in webs of social relations within the realm of state law and across a graduated set of formal legal statuses for noncitizens
Adjudication · Appeal · Citizenship · Economic Justice · German · Political science · Politics · Realm · Sociology · Transitional justice · European and International Law Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights
Bureaucratic configuration and discretion in asylum case processing
Post‐2015 refugees in Germany
Where Asylum and Austerity Meet
Legal pluralism and the production of (un)certainty in lived migration orders
Legal status and refugees' perceptions of institutional justice
The making of procedural justice
Just another benefit? Administrative judges' constructions of sameness and difference in asylum adjudications
Deciding on asylum dilemmas
Rules versus relationships
Virtuous citizens, disruptive subjects
The “Inner Belief” of French Asylum Judges
Citizenship, Anthropology of
Enacting European Citizenship
Contesting Immigration Policy in Court
Asylum Matters
Political Asylum Deceptions
Stategraphy
Citizenship in flux
It’s Not What You Know, It’s How You Use It
Do the Facts Speak for Themselves? Country of Origin Information in French and British Refugee Status Determination Procedures
Asylum Determination in Europe
Professional Emotions in Court
From the Law to the Decision
Culture all around? Contextualising anthropological expertise in European courtroom settings
Interpretation, translation and intercultural communication in refugee status determination procedures in the UK and France
Magistrates' Everyday Work and Emotional Labour
The Map and the Territory
Excluded by crisis management? Legislative hyperactivity in post‐2015 Germany
The tribunal atmosphere
Refugees, migrants, neither, both
Introduction
Theorising noncitizenship
Just another benefit? Administrative judges' constructions of sameness and difference in asylum adjudications
Trained to Disbelieve
Waiting as probation
Contested control at the margins of the state
Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes
Citizenship, the self, and political agency
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |