Condition B effects in two simple steps

This paper is concerned with constraints on the interpretation of pronominal anaphora, in particular Condition B effects. It aims to contribute to a particular approach, initiated by Reinhart (Anaphora and semantic interpretation, 1983) and further developed elsewhere. It proposes a modification of Reinhart’s Interface Rule, and argues that the resulting theory compares favorably with others, while being compatible with independently motivated general hypotheses about the interaction between different interpretive mechanisms

Epistemology · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Natural language processing · Philosophy of language · Programming language · Semantic interpretation · Syntax · Theoretical linguistics · Computer Science · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

• Precede-and-command revisited

  Open Access•Benjamin Bruening•Language•2014

  Incluir item

• Remarks on Rule H

  Open Access•Alex Drummond•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

  Incluir item

• The clitic binding restriction revisited

  Isabelle Charnavel, Victoria Mateus et al.•The Linguistic Review•2015

  Incluir item

• The lexical pragmatics of reflexive marking

  Open Access•Fabienne Martin, Florian Schäfer et al.•Language•2025

  Incluir item

• On Referential Parallelism and Compulsory Binding

  Nicholas Fleisher•Linguistic Inquiry•2023

  Incluir item

• Stripping and VP Ellipsis in Reduced Temporal Adverbs

  Open Access•Jason Overfelt•Syntax•2021

  Incluir item

• Anaphor Binding

  Isabelle Charnavel, Dominique Sportiche•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  Incluir item

• Generalizing the Presuppositional Approach to the Binding Conditions

  Open Access•Benjamin Bruening•Syntax•2021

  Incluir item

• Binding theory-Structure sensitivity of referential dependencies

  Open Access•Dominique Sportiche•Lingua•2013

  Incluir item

• Binding Theory

  Open Access•Daneel Buring, Daniel Büring•Binding Theory•2005

  Incluir item

• Presumptive Meanings

  C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Presumptive Meanings•2000

  Incluir item

• Anaphora

  Yan Huang•Anaphora•2000

  Incluir item

• Interface Strategies

  Tanya Reinhart•Interface Strategies•2006

  Incluir item

• The Syntax of Silence

  Jason Merchant•The syntax of silence•2001

  Incluir item

• Ellipsis and higher-order unification

  Open Access•Mary Dalrymple, Stuart M Shieber et al.•Linguistics and Philosophy•1991

  Incluir item

• Anaphora and Type Logical Grammar

  Open Access•Gerhard Jäger•Anaphora and Type Logical Grammar…•2005

  Incluir item

• Discourse parallelism, ellipsis, and ambiguity

  Nicholas Asher, Daniel Hardt et al.•Journal of Semantics•2001

  Incluir item

• Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution

  ROB A VAN DER SANDT•Journal of Semantics•1992

  Incluir item

• Ellipsis and the Structure of Discourse

  Daniel Hardt•Journal of Semantics•2004

  Incluir item

• On so-called ?sloppy identity

  Open Access•sten Dahl, �sten Dahl•Synthese•1973

  Incluir item

• Free Variable Economy

  Floris Roelofsen•Linguistic Inquiry•2011

  Incluir item

• Indices and Identity

  Edwin Williams, Robert Fiengo et al.•Language•1995

  Incluir item

• Non-Redundancy

  Open Access•Philippe Schlenker•Natural Language Semantics•2005

  Incluir item

• Primitives of Binding

  Eric Reuland•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  Incluir item

• Ellipsis Sites as Definite Descriptions

  Paul Elbourne•Linguistic Inquiry•2008

  Incluir item

• Givenness, Avoidf and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent

  Roger Schwarzschild•Natural Language Semantics•1999

  Incluir item

• Bound to Bind

  Daneel Buring, Daniel Büring•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

  Incluir item