Distancing and discrediting among persons with an acquired spinal cord injury
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4592693 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Niels Boysen Feddersen (0000-0002-3670-9981, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences), Pia Wedege (0000-0002-1889-4423, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 382 |
| Páginas | 118376 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118376 |
| PMID | 40618666 |
| OpenAlex | W4412025871 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 30 |
This study examines how individuals with acquired spinal cord injury maintain, contest, and dissolve boundaries within their peer community, with a particular focus on the roles of distancing and discrediting others. Carrying out a 26-month ethnography generated data from participant observation, interviews, social media, crowdfunding initiatives, news stories, government policies, reports, and related research. Drawing on theories of symbolic boundaries and stigmas, we theorised how the comparative context influences how individuals can be included or excluded from peer groups. We found that the ways non-disabled relate to people with a spinal cord injury influence the ways symbolic boundaries are negotiated among peers with a spinal cord injury. Wheelchair users are often perceived as helpless and those who can walk are invisible to most common passersby and thereby not recognised as persons with disability. These perceptions influence internal definitions within the group of people with spinal cord injuries. Consequently, they engage in processes of distancing or discrediting to negotiate group membership, what constitutes a "real injury", and in some cases, exclude people from their group. This is a highly sensitive subject; however, denying the presence of such processes could limit opportunities for action when people are excluded
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Criminology · Disease · Distancing · Pathology · Psychiatry · Social distance · Sociology · Spinal cord · Disability Rights and Representation · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Medicine · Virology
Social categorization and group homogeneity
Disabling Barriers
Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited
Young people's embodied social capital and performing disability
Disabled people's attitudes toward other impairment groups
Is There a Disability Culture? A Syncretisation of Three Possible World Views
Well, I Know this is Going to Sound Very Strange to You, but I Don't See Myself as a Disabled Person
Living ‘with TBI’ as complex embodiment
Knowledge, values and educational policy – a critical perspective
The Relative Permeability of Class Boundaries to Cross-Class Friendships
For a Sociology of Flesh and Blood
Episodic Narrative Interview
Making mistakes in ethnography
Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments" in Research
The Dis/appearing Sporting Body
The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences
Doing Disability
The violence of disablism
The Extended Case Method
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |