Essential for society but not equally deserving of preferential treatment? A discrete-choice experiment regarding Covid-19 healthcare
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4592947 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andreas Heusler (0000-0002-2339-9312, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung), Anna Heusler, Christopher Osiander (0000-0002-1828-2013, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung, autor correspondente), Julia Schmidtke (0000-0002-5206-0211, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 311 |
| Páginas | 115304 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115304 |
| PMID | 36063591 |
| OpenAlex | W4293032735 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 31 |
Workers' risks of contracting COVID-19 vary according to individual behaviors, occupations and job characteristics. Therefore, persons may consider different groups of workers more or less deserving of COVID-19 healthcare. To evaluate such preferences, we conducted an online conjoint experiment on the precedence of ICU treatment and COVID-19 vaccination. Our results demonstrate that working in essential occupations increases the likelihood of being considered deserving of vaccination and ICU treatment. We also find differences in how essential workers are prioritized, yet these differences cannot be clearly attributed to risk exposure or occupational prestige. Furthermore, we show that age, asthma, household context and compliance with COVID-19 measures significantly affect respondents' choices, while weight matters only for vaccination priority. Our results therefore contribute to research regarding the characteristics that are salient to fair distributions of scarce resources among workers during a health crisis
Affect (linguistics · Conjoint analysis · Context (archaeology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Microeconomics · Pandemic · Preference · Prestige · Vaccination · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Virology
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist
Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of Covid-19
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19
Difficult trade-offs in response to Covid-19
The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare
Saving the most lives—A comparison of European triage guidelines in the context of the Covid‐19 pandemic
Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination
The perceived deservingness of Covid-19 healthcare in the Netherlands
Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic
Unravelling deservingness
Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies
The mythologisation of key workers
Natives’ Attitudes and Immigrants’ Unemployment Durations
A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status
Affective partisan polarization and moral dilemmas during the Covid-19 pandemic
Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis
Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public
Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in Covid-19 pandemic control
Healthcare chauvinism during the Covid-19 pandemic
Welfare Regimes and the Norms of Social Exchange
Welfare deservingness opinions from heuristic to measurable concept
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |