How Doctors Talk About Medical Errors

During the last three decades, an increased amount of research on errors in health care has been conducted. Studies show that physicians find it challenging to handle errors because of the blame and guilt that errors cause. Communicating with colleagues has been identified as vital for coping with errors and for creating a just culture; however, many physicians do not usually discuss their errors. Knowledge about how junior doctors experience errors is vital to ensure that they both receive emotional support and learn from errors. To capture junior doctors' perceptions and experiences, we used a qualitative, exploratory design based on virtual focus groups. We conducted seven virtual focus groups with 22 junior doctors from 11 specialties. We defined three main themes: (1) how the junior doctors conceptualized medical errors, (2) how they experienced talk about errors among colleagues, and (3) the context in which this talk took place. The participants experienced errors as challenging elements in their working life; however, they struggled to define it. They described inconsistencies regarding the reasons for discussing errors within the learning environment, with some being experienced as constructive (providing education and support) and some as destructive (involving blame and shame). There was a discrepancy between the wish to normalize error and the lack of sharing between colleagues. Our study shows that error in health care is a complex phenomenon that challenges junior doctors' navigation in clinical practice. Despite efforts to implement an open and just culture, this has not yet been achieved

Blame · Constructive · Exploratory research · Focus group · Health care · Medical education · Perception · Qualitative research · Shame · Viewpoints · Clinical Psychology · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Computer Science · Empathy and Medical Education · Innovations in Medical Education · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Human Error

  Open Access•James Reason•Human Error•1990

  Incluir item

• Forgive and Remember

  Charles L Bosk•Forgive and Remember•2003

  Incluir item

• Association of Perceived Medical Errors With Resident Distress and Empathy

  Colin P West, Mashele M Huschka et al.•JAMA•2006

  Incluir item

• Qualitative evaluation and research methods

  Open Access•David Ellis•International Journal of…•1990

  Incluir item

• Medical error

  Open Access•Albert W Wu•BMJ•2000

  Incluir item

• Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting

  Braun, Victoria Clarke•Health Psychology Review•2023

  Incluir item

• Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized Patients

  Troyen A Brennan, LUCIAN L LEAPE et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•1991

  Incluir item

• Residents, Responsibility, and Error

  Open Access•Lisa Shepherd, Stephanie Chilton et al.•Academic Medicine•2023

  Incluir item

• Shedding the cobra effect

  Open Access•Lara Varpio, Rola Ajjawi et al.•Medical Education•2016

  Incluir item

• Focus Groups in Social Research

  Michael Bloor, JULIET C FRANKLAND et al.•Focus groups in social research•2001

  Incluir item

• The views and experiences of patients and health‐care professionals on the disclosure of adverse events

  Open Access•Raabia Sattar, Judith Johnson et al.•Health Expectations•2020

  Incluir item

• Using thematic analysis in psychology

  Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  Incluir item

• Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies

  Open Access•Kirsti Malterud, Volkert Dirk Siersma et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

  Incluir item

• Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection

  Open Access•Mandy Archibald, Rachel C Ambagtsheer et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  Incluir item

• Focus Groups

  David L Morgan•Annual Review of Sociology•1996

  Incluir item