Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Knowledge, perception, and awareness of society regarding (over)abundance of wild ungulate populations

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4859989
AutoresAntonio J Carpio (0000-0002-6989-970X), Pelayo Acevedo (0000-0002-3509-7696), Rafael Villafuerte-Jordán, Rafael Villafuerte‐Jordán (0000-0002-1596-7930), Rodolfo Siller Rodríguez (0000-0002-9447-9336), Rocío Serrano Rodríguez, Roberto Pascual-Rico (0000-0002-7340-1230), María Martínez-Jauregui, Maria Martínez‐Jauregui (0000-0002-7590-822X)
Ano2024
Volume29
Fascículo1
Data de publicação2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
EditoraResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-14828-290124
OpenAlexW4392207429
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas13

Social perception of ungulates and their management depends on both their abundance and the socioeconomic context. However, an approach that addresses this issue is currently unavailable. Our objective was to employ a survey in Spain (n = 440) to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions on the eight species of wild ungulates that inhabit the Iberian Peninsula, and their abundance. The results showed that respondents were unaware of the existence of many of the species. Only wild boar (95% of the surveyed population) and red deer (72%) were widely identified. Respondents perceived that urban, agricultural, and livestock contexts were the most frequent suffering overabundance, with the wild boar as most relevant species (86%). This study illustrates how a better understanding of overabundance and public perceptions is important to ensure effective communication on ungulate population status and to improve public support for their management, thus avoiding bias toward certain species, impacts, or specific contexts

Biology · Geography · Habitat · Perception · Ungulate · Ecology and biodiversity studies · Rangeland and Wildlife Management · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • Unpacking social tensions in unexpected human-wildlife interactions

    Carole Marin•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2025

  • Leverage ranger’s knowledge to assess wild boar contributions to people in Spain

    Open Access•Daniela Alba-Patiño, María Martínez-Jauregui et al.•Ecosystems and People•2026

  • Public management attitudes and behavioural intentions towards the management of (over)abundant wild ungulate populations

    Open Access•Antonio J Carpio, Roberto Pascual-Rico et al.•AMBIO•2026

  • Preferences of experts and the general public about wildlife management in Spain

    Open Access•Daniela Alba-Patiño, Miguel Delibes-Mateos et al.•AMBIO•2026

  • The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Berta Martín-López, Carlos Montes et al.•Biological Conservation•2007

  • The NR-6

    Open Access•Elizabeth K Nisbet, John M Zelenski•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Ecological Knowledge is Lost in Wealthier Communities and Countries

    Sarah Pilgrim, Sarah E Pilgrim et al.•Environmental Science & Technology•2008

  • Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett•Conservation Biology•2016

  • Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world

    Open Access•Hannes König, Christian Kiffner et al.•Conservation Biology•2020

  • Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes

    Open Access•Guillaume Chapron, Petra Kaczensky et al.•Science•2014

  • What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.

    Jose M Cortina•Journal of Applied Psychology•1993

  • Should we connect children to nature in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Brendon M H Larson, Bob Fischer et al.•People and Nature•2022

  • Primate and wildlife law outreach campaigns in the Republic of Congo

    Open Access•Thomas Breuer, Yves Londza et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2021

  • Will Hunters Steward Wolves? A Comment on Treves and Martin

    Jeremy T Bruskotter, David C Fulton•Society & Natural Resources•2012

  • Shepherds’ local knowledge and scientific data on the scavenging ecosystem service

    Open Access•Zebensui Morales‐Reyes, Berta Martín-López et al.•AMBIO•2019

  • Social actors’ perceptions of wildlife

    Open Access•Ainara Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara Cortés‐Avizanda et al.•AMBIO•2022

  • Slovenian Students' Knowledge and Opinions about Wild Boar (Sus ScrofaL)

    Nataša Siard, Dušanka Jordan•Anthrozoös•2018

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano4
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae