How is the Advocacy Coalition Framework Doing? Some Issues since the 2014 Agenda

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4883437
AutoresJanaina Ma (0000-0003-3646-3720, Universidade de Brasília), Marco Aurélio Cirilo Lemos (0000-0001-8318-6282, Universidade de Brasília), Diego Mota Vieira (0000-0003-1275-1648, Universidade de Brasília)
Ano2020
Fascículo32
Páginas7-42
Data de publicação2020-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoRevista Brasileira de Ciência Política (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0103-3352 • E-ISSN: 2178-4884
EditoraFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/0103-335220203201
OpenAlexW3081084383
SCIELO_PIDS0103-33522020000200007
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas47

This article presents an international review of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) from 2015 to 2018. Forty-six empirical works that use the ACF as the main model or one of the main models for the analysis of public policies were analyzed. Bibliometric data, research methodologies and theoretical components have been considered in this analysis. In addition, this article fills in a gap in previous reviews of the ACF by presenting an exploratory review of ACF applications in Latin America. Our conclusions show that the research agenda proposed in 2014 has evolved over the last few years, but still presents unexplored challenges and possibilities for researchers interested in the use of ACF. We also offer some recommendations for future research

Data science · Exploratory analysis · Exploratory research · Latin Americans · Management science · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Policy and Administration Research