Officers' Rights

The changing rights of legally designated officers provides a comprehensive framework for following American constitutional development over time, in both public and private settings. Rights are defined as judicially enforceable claims on the person or actions of another; development, as enduring change in constitutional provision, structure, and doctrine. It is proposed that constitutional development as a historical process has consisted of a shift in the balance between the rights of officers and the rights of citizens. The framework is demonstrated empirically in connection with the Bill of Rights, federalism, and the separation of powers. Officers' rights is recommended as a method for studying constitutions comparatively and for linking constitutional development to other political events and phenomena like social movements and parties

Balance (ability · Bill of rights · Constitution · Constitutional law · Constitutional right · Doctrine · Federalism · Fundamental rights · Human rights · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public rights · Separation of powers · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology

• Max Weber and the Ethics of Office

  Paul Du Gay•The Oxford handbook of sociology…•2009

  Incluir item

• Human Rights and Duties

  Norman J Finkel, F M Moghaddam•The Psychology Of Rights And…•2006

  Incluir item

• Moral monsters and patriot acts

  Norman J Finkel•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2006

  Incluir item

• Doing Time

  Open Access•Karen Orren•Studies in American Political…•2012

  Incluir item

• Beyond Discretion

  Open Access•Austin Sarat, C H D Clarke et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2008

  Incluir item

• Cold Case File

  Open Access•Karen Orren, Christopher Walker et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

  Incluir item

• Political Citizenship and Democratization

  Open Access•Eileen Mcdonagh•American Political Science Review•2002

  Incluir item

• Belated feudalism

  Karen Orren•Belated feudalism•1991

  Incluir item

• The liberal tradition in America

  Louis Hartz•The liberal tradition in America•1991

  Incluir item

• Civic Ideals

  R M Smith•Civic Ideals•2017

  Incluir item

• Civic Ideals

  Rogers M Smith•Civic Ideals•2008

  Incluir item

• Why Parties?

  John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  Incluir item

• Rights talk

  Mary Ann Glendon•Rights talk•1991

  Incluir item

• The third wave

  Samuel P Huntington•The third wave•1991

  Incluir item

• The History of Contempt of Court

  Theodore F T Plucknett, JOHN C FOX•Harvard Law Review•1927

  Incluir item

• There is no rationality that is not first ecological

  Open Access•Jock Gilchrist•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2020

  Incluir item

• The Marshall Court and Cultural Change, 1815-1835

  James L Bugg, Gillian E White•Journal of the Early Republic•1988

  Incluir item

• The Federalists; A Study in Administrative History

  A Morgan Young, Alfred Young et al.•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1948

  Incluir item

• We the People

  Open Access•Jack P Greene•Political Science Quarterly•1992

  Incluir item

• Democracy's discontent

  Michael J Sandel•Democracy's discontent•1996

  Incluir item

• Caste, Class, and Equal Citizenship

  William E Forbath•Michigan Law Review•1999

  Incluir item

• Judicial Independence and Democratization

  Christopher M Larkins, Christopher Larkins•The American Journal of…•1996

  Incluir item