Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Creativity, paradigms and morphological constructions

Evidence from Dutch pseudoparticiples

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5043622
AutoresMuriel Norde (0000-0003-4944-8810, 240387 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Nordeuropa-Institut , Berlin , Germany), Graeme Trousdale (0000-0002-4148-166X, Linguistics & English Language, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , Scotland, UK)
Ano2024
Data de publicação2024-09-20
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLinguistics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X
EditoraWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ling-2023-0194
OpenAlexW4402650272
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas39

Pseudoparticiples follow phonotactic, morphological, and syntactic rules for regular participles, but they are special in that they lack corresponding verbal forms. This article offers a constructionist account of two types of pseudoparticiples in Dutch, i.e., those with a nominal base and the prefix ont- or be-, e.g., ontkoeid 'de-cowed' or bedauwd 'bedewed'. Their properties raise interesting questions regarding the nature of morphological creativity, back-formation, and the establishment of new schemas or paradigms. Using data from the nlTenTen14 corpus, we consider constraints on the formation of verbal paradigms from such pseudoparticiples, and what this tells us about the nature of morphological creativity. Our corpus data suggest substantial differences between be- and ont-pseudoparticiples in terms of frequency distributions, productivity, and syntactic behavior. Drawing on concepts from cognitive linguistics generally and Construction Morphology in particular, this article addresses the usefulness of the distinction between full and partial sanction as a means to explain the variation (i) within the pseudoparticiple sets and (ii) between regular and pseudoparticiples. We also suggest some revisions to the notions of E- and F-creativity to account for differences between the be- and ont- sets

Creativity · Linguistics · Sociology · Theoretical linguistics · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Constructional approaches to creativity and productivity in English

    Open Access•Turo Vartiainen, Tanja Säily•English Language and Linguistics•2025

  • On the relationship between linguistic creativity and change in morphological constructions

    Open Access•Graeme Trousdale, Muriel Norde•English Language and Linguistics•2025

  • Blows of meaning. Morphological creativity in the construction [ a N-suffix singular.blow limpio ] in Spanish

    Carmen Mellado Blanco, Pedro Ivorra Ordines•Folia Linguistica•2026

  • From spearhead to crackhead

    Open Access•José Antonio Sánchez Fajardo, Elisa Mattiello•WORD Structure•2025

  • Explain Me This

    Adele E Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Explain Me This•2019

  • Constructions at Work

    Adele Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Constructions at Work•2005

  • Lexicalization and Language Change

    Open Access•Laurel J Brinton, Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Lexicalization and Language Change•2005

  • The Dynamics of the Linguistic System

    Herman Schmid, Hans-Jörg Schmid•Dynamics of the Linguistic System•2020

  • The Grammar Network

    Open Access•Holger Diessel•Grammar Network•2019

  • Parts and wholes

    Farrell Ackerman, James P Blevins et al.•Analogy in grammar•2009

  • Corpus linguistics in morphology

    R Harald Baayen•Corpus Linguistics. Volume 2•2009

  • Current Issues in Linguistic Theory

    Noam Chomsky•Current Issues in Linguistic Theory•1975

  • Creative intentions — The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’

    Peter Uhrig•Cognitive Semiotics•2020

  • Creativity within and outside the linguistic system

    Alexander Berg, Nikola Anna Kompa•Cognitive Semiotics•2020

  • Speakers are creative, within limits — a response to Peter Uhrig

    Thomas Hoffmann•Cognitive Semiotics•2020

  • Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax

    Dirk Pijpops, Isabeau De Smet et al.•Constructions and Frames•2018

  • Lexical expansion in the Have and BE perfect in Dutch

    Evie Coussé•Diachronica•2014

  • The Sketch Engine

    Open Access•Adam Kilgarriff, Vít Baisa et al.•Lexicography•2014

  • Schemas and the frequency/acceptability mismatch

    Open Access•Sabine Flach•Cognitive Linguistics•2020

  • Construction Morphology

    Jenny Audring, Francesca Masini•Oxford Handbook of Morphological…•2018

  • Radical Construction Grammar

    William Croft•Radical Construction Grammar•2001

  • Why is grammaticalization irreversible

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistics•1999

  • Coercion

    Open Access•Peter Lauwers, Dominique Willems•Linguistics•2011

  • Productivity and English derivation

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, Harald Baayen et al.•Linguistics•1991

  • On ambiguous past participles in Dutch

    Open Access•Evie Coussé•Linguistics•2011

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano4
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae